Right on Nahimana! who said those trees are a renewable resource ? OMG! those majestic Noble living Trees Are over 2400 years old! Who in there right mind would cut one down, GEORGE, you have been very very bad ! I send your AZZ to the cornfield! and this is some Judaical activism i can support ! here comes the judge, here comes the judge, sock it to HIM Baby!
2006-08-25 10:32:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
The giant sequoia trees should never be logged. They are magnificent.
No true conservative would ever wish to log the Giant Redwoods, nor would a true conservative ever suggest NOT conserving those great trees.
They are awesome. I would rather see all of Washington DC bulldozed than one sequoia cut down for lumber.
2006-08-25 02:03:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think it's fantastic!! Who in their right mind would want to log Sequoia and/or Redwoods!?, you've got to be mentally unbalanced, afterall it's the great Sequoia's that create a natural catherdral in nature, their captivating height and beauty leave one in awe, Bush is an ape.
2006-08-25 08:38:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dr.Feelgood 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, it is wonderful. Finally someone in power who isn't corrupt. I have even less respect for Bush now that I know about his plan to murcer innocent trees. People may not agree with me, but it is murder. And yes, finally Bush didn't get his way with something! Ha! Stupid monkey.
2006-08-25 02:02:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by metalheart19 2
·
4⤊
0⤋
You know what's funny about that ruling and some others is that it's the judiciary who's finally stepping up and taking Bush's agenda to task. Goes to show you what part partisan politics plays in social welfare. Now all we got to do is put some hotels on some of the supreme court justices' properties, get them to recind their private property ruling, then we'd be straight.
2006-08-25 02:07:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by silas h 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I agree totallly. Finally, someone with brains is tossing speed bumps in this idiot's way. I hope the rest of the world wakes up just as soon and we can all return to sanity.
2006-08-25 01:59:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Truth 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Well, it's about time! Someone needs to protect the environment and obviously Bush would rather do the vice versa.
2006-08-25 02:01:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by dewdropinn 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Thank God. That man has no respect for nature. He's self absorbed. Can't wait till 2008!
2006-08-25 02:03:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Bush was just unlucky. He just ran into one of the few judges that doesn't take bribes.
2006-08-25 02:00:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh, so Mother Nature needs a favor? Well, maybe she should have thought of that when she was besetting us with droughts and floods and poison monkeys! Nature started the fight for survival, and now she wants to quit because she's losing? Well, I say hard cheese.
2006-08-25 02:02:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
5⤋