Have no legs or no arms? And why?
2006-08-24 18:12:30 · 23 answers · asked by ... 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
if I had no arms then I wouldn't have hands and how would I touch you??
2006-08-26 04:38:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No legs. I could live without them, arms on the other hand are very useful.
2006-08-25 01:16:45 · answer #2 · answered by Dr. Nick 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No legs. With arms I would still be able to take care of myself.
2006-08-25 01:22:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No legs, because there r a lot of events 4 people in wheel chairs, and you really can't do anything w/out arms. there r no events 4 that.
2006-08-25 01:18:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would rather have no legs . with arms I would be more capable of careing for myself as far as cooking ,cleaning , and personal cleanliness.I also would be better able to work.
2006-08-25 01:38:25 · answer #5 · answered by whoemeye 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd rather go without no legs. I think I can learn how to get around better in a wheelchair than to walk aroud with no arms.
LOL & Be Good...=)
2006-08-25 01:18:32 · answer #6 · answered by feva 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No legs because I'm an artist and I also feel that I could adapt to wheelchair life more easily then loosing my hands. I feel you could function more easily and adjust to life with no legs much easier.
2006-08-25 01:16:36 · answer #7 · answered by sarah_lynn 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I already don't see very well, so I can't eimagine not having use of my hands. I wouldn't want to lose my legs either though.
2006-08-25 04:17:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Have no legs
2006-08-25 08:24:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anry 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no legs i could get fakes ones or roll out in a wheel chair
2006-08-25 01:15:26 · answer #10 · answered by want_me_luv_me 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
rather be without legs im lazy anyway lol
2006-08-25 01:15:48 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋