2006-08-24 16:50:16 · 14 answers · asked by Bantree 4 in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Pregnancy
She needs to add 18 to whatever number she is and make sure she can still do do it till then if she thinks she can then good luck to her.
2006-08-24 16:54:45 · answer #1 · answered by blueseawale 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I believe it depends on the individual and the state of wellness their physique is in. It is true that when you are 35 and older, risks for distinctive delivery defects increase, but i don't believe that should discontinue anybody from having a little one after 35. A variety of ladies are waiting till their 30's and even early 40's before they have youngsters. I'm on my first and i am 24. I plan on having my 2nd at 27-28 and then i am stopping since I simplest need 2 youngsters.
2016-08-09 12:31:08 · answer #2 · answered by tuft 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you want a child, than you should consider having a baby right up till the point that your body is no longer capable of carrying a child. You need to realize that there are a lot of added risks to mother and baby when the mother is older (even as young as 35 can be considered older maternity wise), but as long as you are seeing a high risk obgyn you should be fine. Good Luck and Best Wishes!
2006-08-24 18:55:39 · answer #3 · answered by Mary D 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As long as she's healthy I think any age is fine. Although, I think if you've already gone through menopause, it's not a great idea. If you're body is telling you that you're past your time, then you should listen to it. Of course there are exceptions to that like women who go through menopause in their 20s & 30s.
People should worry more about the little girls out there who are getting pregnant. At least the women who are having them later in life have usually thought it out more and are more capable of supporting their children.
2006-08-24 17:04:08 · answer #4 · answered by Nicole H 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thought I stopped having kids at 25. Then when I was 31, I had my baby girl. I got my tubes tied after that, 5 kids were way too many! I love them all and wouldn't know what to do with out them!
I would say have kids when your ready and quit when your ready. Unless menopause steps in first!
2006-08-24 17:29:31 · answer #5 · answered by Regina R 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well you can have them really as long as your body still can handle it. I say no longer than age 30. Only because your egg changes it is not so round and healthy anymore! When you get past 30. So have them young if you are married and can afford it. Plus I read an article today stating that if you had your kids before age 25 they will have a healthier life as an adult!
2006-08-24 17:05:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I say if you are still young enough to be able to do things with the your children. It is not fair to the kids if you are to old to be able to take the kids to do outings and make them just hang out at home because you can not get around. My mother and father in law are in their 50's and my sister in law is 12 and she doesn't get to do anything because they are to broken down to get around the house let alone take her to do kid stuff.
2006-08-24 17:32:54 · answer #7 · answered by Kimberly S 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most docs. say it's dangerous after 35 because of the high risk of birth defects. I know women who were in their 40s and had noi problems . As long as your body and mind are willing and healthy go for it. Just be sure your completely informed on the risks, but the benifits can be awsome.
2006-08-24 16:56:06 · answer #8 · answered by K C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When she is no longer physically able to have children (unless she has fertility problems). If she is still able to have kids, it shouldn't matter what age she is. Good luck : )
2006-08-24 16:57:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
whenever the woman is ready to stop thinking about it. sounds like you are getting discouraged. there is always adoption.
2006-08-24 17:03:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
45 and ups
2006-08-24 16:57:03 · answer #11 · answered by Ms. Plummer 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋