Not that this applies to me because I am still ALL THAT.
2006-08-24 16:08:46 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
If they are salaried employees of a Brothel that pays their Social Security benifits and they are terminated based on agism or another apperance judgement? Yes, the can contest the termination and it's virtually impossible for the Brothel to win judgement against them.
2006-08-24 16:25:01 · answer #1 · answered by W0LF 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh yes, of course they can collect. All they have to do is go down to their local unemployment office and file the paperwork and make sure they put down "male prostitute, laid off due to wrinkles and flab." *laugh*
2006-08-24 23:12:10 · answer #2 · answered by Rawrrrr 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe this would fall more into the Workers Compensation category rather than Unemployment due to the fact that it was something that occurred while they were working that resulted in them being unable to work.
2006-08-24 23:13:49 · answer #3 · answered by Sky 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It sounds pretty far-fetched to me. Prostitution is illegal in most places, and the money that changes hands is under the table. Just my personal opinion.
2006-08-24 23:26:41 · answer #4 · answered by joecool 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think they should be able to collect disability - purely because they have lost the skills they need for work. Or maybe they could turn to pimping. They'd have to train up on the pimp slap though...
2006-08-24 23:13:19 · answer #5 · answered by soulgirl76 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only people who contribute to unemployment can receive it....looks like you're outta luck!
2006-08-24 23:12:30 · answer #6 · answered by Chatty 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I didn't realize that it was a career choice. They never had anyone like that at the Job Fair.
2006-08-24 23:16:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if they make sure to pay into thier HMO first! LOL! Tru
2006-08-24 23:15:02 · answer #8 · answered by Tru 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No but he may collect a few STD'S!!
2006-08-24 23:11:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no because no taxes etc. were collected in this illegal act
2006-08-24 23:13:17 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋