This problem can be solved by a sophisticated search.
Let's look at z*w. Since z < = 19 and w <= 19 let's
set z = 11. Now try all possible values for w.
For each such pair compute 539 - zw and
factor the resulting number. Check if it has
two factors in the given range.
Now increase z by 1 and repeat . Do this
step from z = 12 to 19.
Note that it may seem as if there are 81 pairs
to try, but in fact there are only 45, because
if the pair zw does not yield a solution, neither
does wz.
I tried all pairs with z = 11 and none yielded
a solution, but z= 12 worked:
The pair 12, 18 yields xy = 323 = 17*19.
So a solution is 17*19 + 12*18.
I don't know if this is the only solution, as I
didn't check further.
2006-08-31 03:26:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by steiner1745 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Excel solver can solve this problem once the appropriate constraints are entered. For X, Y, Z, and W there are three constraints each.
1. All four are integers
2. All four are greater than or equal to 11, and
3. All four are less than or equal to 19.
You want the answer to be exactly 539. Just plug in the numbers and stir gently.
voila 12*18 + 17*19 = 539
2006-08-31 09:41:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Helpful 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Analytically, I don't think it can be solved without additional information. Your best bet for something like this is Mathcad or other math software package. If that is not an option, you could brute force it with some simple code (PERL for example --- which is free). By the way... there is no solution.
$counter = 0;
$X = 11;
$Y = 11;
$Z = 11;
$W = 11;
$FN = 0;
while ($FN != 539)
{
while ($X < 20)
{
while ($Y < 20)
{
while ($Z < 20)
{
while ($W < 20)
{
$FN = $X * $Y + $Z * $W;
$counter ++;
$W ++;
};
$W = 11;
$Z ++;
};
$Z = 11;
$Y ++;
};
$Y = 11;
$X ++;
};
$X = 11;
};
};
2006-08-30 18:41:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by JustAnotherUser 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Perhaps it is impossible to find analytical integer methods for such quadratic problems. But you can reduce it somewhat to form simpler sub-problems, and solve it by say, brute-force.
Let A = X*Y, and let B=Z*W
Then A = 539 - B
You don;t seem to have a lower bound. Assuming you have one, say at 0, then form a box for A as follows: ((0,0), (0,20),(10,0),(10,20)), similarly for B. On a line, A takes values in [0,200] = 201 integer values. Similarly do so for B. For each value from A's line get a value in th B line. Form a table.
Then for each value in A (=X*Y), get X and Y for integer values from inside A's box. Similarly for B.
2006-08-24 14:21:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by noitall 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
You seem youthful, you're nevertheless in extreme college i'm guessing. Weed is actual no longer fairly worth each and each of the problem it causes. I smoked on a daily basis at the same time as i became youthful and it offered no longer something yet issues. yet in any case, i'm positive you don't want a lecture because you likely comprehend each and each of the hazards of marijuana. i imagine your pal is basically searching for you and stressful about you, Like a sturdy pal does. She likely likes you higher than her different 'stunning pal', accordingly the rationalization she concerns about you higher and easily receives mad at you. i imagine try to be grateful to have this variety of sensible pal. even with the undeniable fact that, At one factor she will be able to offer up on you. She gained't want to waste her time stressful anymore and then you would possibly want to have a perplexing decision; might want to you rather save smoking or save your pal? sturdy success!
2016-11-27 19:52:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by melaine 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes . Use Operation research.
In that u need to use simplex method.
If u notice it, there are 5 equations here, considering the < and > .
2006-08-31 02:45:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, i dont think u can solve this problem
since u have 4 variables (w,x,y,z), u need 4 equations to solve these 4 variables
2006-08-24 14:19:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Travis 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
only by hit & trick method
2006-08-29 00:24:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by bonney 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
fggfbcn
2006-08-30 14:16:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by redkids 2
·
0⤊
0⤋