English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

23 answers

The Moon as we know is made of rock and most of what constitutes rock is in fact oxygen. The Moon has also been bathed by the solar winds for around 3 billion years, saturating its surface in hydrogen. If we burn the hydrogen by combining it with the oxygen, adding a spark, or a platinum catalyst, bang (cheap energy), we have water. Incidentally, if the need is for a rocket motor propellant you do not have to even combine the elements.

Now think what would happen if we developed cheap energy and was able to send it back to the earth.

Then you would have to find a way to protect it.

2006-08-24 13:47:56 · answer #1 · answered by dam 5 · 0 0

There are interesting things we could build in zero gravity that might warrant the cost of a space station. But the moon doesnt have zero gravity.
We can't economically mine the moon, its still much less expensive to find metals on earth.
So there's really not much to learn or achieve by going there.

2006-08-24 13:38:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the moon is just full of sand and rock that goes half way down the moon so it is almost impossible to build a space station on the moon

2006-08-25 08:23:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We may at some point build a scientific station there (great place for a telescope with no atmosphere or light pollution)but it is difficult to haul a bunch of stuff there including astronauts to build the thing. Right now it's just easier to build the labs in orbit.

2006-08-24 13:37:16 · answer #4 · answered by seizod 3 · 0 0

We never went to the moon (there is no physical proof). It was all a hoax, cooked up, and staged by the American government to save face in the space race against USSR.
Man could not at the moment go to the moon as their space suits could not protect the wearer against the radiation outside of the Van Allen Belt. They can only protect them in orbit,(i.e. current space walks and construction of the International Space Station), which are well inside the Van Allen belt

2006-08-24 13:42:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I hope they do sometime soon. It seems very likely within the next 5 to 10 years. Especially since they're already talking about open to the public(rich folks that is) trips to the orbiting Space Station.

2006-08-24 13:34:35 · answer #6 · answered by Carnie 2 · 0 0

Sending the team available is the costly section. somewhat costly. you are going to be able to desire to circulate all a thank you to the Moon (advance up the stuff and the persons to 11 km/s), then land on the Moon (braking against a million/6 gravity isn't unfastened), take off from the Moon back (the countless human beings might insist on being introduced back alive) which takes extra gasoline, then arrive back at Earth at 25,000 mph (11 km/s) and... desire for the suitable. in assessment, the commute in elementary terms desires to attain somewhat under 8 km/s to attain orbit. Drop off the fabric (which, being interior the shipment carry of the commute, is already interior the right orbit) and the persons. people who insist on coming back, hop back into the commute which basically desires to brake somewhat, inflicting it to drop into the ambience at a safer velocity of 17,000 mph. additionally, on the Moon, you are not getting any of a few large reward of being in orbit (e.g., microgravity experiments). on the gap spation, the "lifeboat" is a undemanding Soyouz pill. You hop in, separate, brake somewhat... and you fall back to Earth. From the Moon, you would be wanting a miles extra difficult area motor vehicle as a "lifeboat". of direction, in case you have the money to construct a Moon base, circulate stunning forward.

2016-09-29 23:04:56 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

because right now, the majority of people in countries that could support a manned presence on the moon, are not interested in spending the money for it

space exploration of any kind is always difficult to justify

the returns are not certain, and some of the returns are intangibles

and space exploration, especially the way we have to do it with such incredible safety precaution, is very expensive

2006-08-24 13:35:48 · answer #8 · answered by enginerd 6 · 0 0

Because, by definition, if it were on the moon it wouldn't be a space station, but rather a lunar station.

2006-08-24 13:34:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You can call me crazy baby
When you hear of my world theory
We're exploring outer space
Colonizing a whole new human race.

I'd go to Mars I'd go to Venus
Go wherever my heart pleases
So I'll pack my bags just in case
We create a better better place

Everything is coming undone
Getting unfurled
I 'm ready to revoke my Earthling citizenship
I'm ready to get on board that galactic spaceship!

....

2006-08-24 13:41:23 · answer #10 · answered by charlielikespeanutbutter 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers