I only want to know who voted the international astronomical union to be in charge of the solar system?

Question

Will, now that you bring it up. After all they could redefine them as simply ant spray.

Answer 1

The International Astronomical Union (IAU) was founded in 1919 to promote the science of astronomy through international cooperation. Commission 41 (History of Astronomy) was created at the 1948 General Assembly, with Otto Neugebauer as its first President. All Members of Commission 41 are also Full Members of the Inter-Union Commission for History of Astronomy (ICHA) established in 2001.

The International Astronomical Union (IAU) unites national astronomical societies from around the world. It is a member of the International_Council_for_Science (ICSU). It is the recognised authority for the naming of stars, planets, asteroids and other celestial bodies and phenomena.

Working groups include the Working Group for Planetary System Nomenclature (WGPSN), which maintains the IAU naming conventions for planetary bodies.

The IAU is also responsible for the system of Astronomical Telegrams, although it does not run it.

Answer 2

You have to understand that science is not part of the democratic process. You cannot vote on whether something is true or not.

Science observes and finds categories that fit the subject matter. These are not activities that involve the average voter and are not really political issues, although there are plenty of people who try to make them so.

The nomenclature and categories are created and modified so that it is easier to explain new observations that change our perceptions of what is out there to be seen. So every once in a while scientist have to modify the terms that even an average citizen might use.

The average citizen is surprised to learn that science is not about absolute unchanging truths but about finding better and better models of reality. That is why, for example, science is a dynamic and changing human activity, continually discovering new things.

Beliefs that claim to have absolute truths are dead and not capable of growth or life.

You apparently felt left out in the scientific process. If this is all that important to you, get an advanced degree in one of the sciences and you can participate. Science is open to everyone and no one is excluded.

Answer 3

easily, i think that their answer is going to prepare out to be ridiculous. through including Ceres, Charon and 2003 UB313 as planets they're establishing the picture voltaic equipment as a lot as dozens of latest 'planets' and that is basically those that all of us comprehend of now. This new definition of a 'planet' will encourage a lot of human beings to save searching for Trans-Neptonian gadgets (TNO's) in the Kuiper Belt. I anticipate that interior 10 years the IAU would have reconvene because there'll be this variety of vast quantity of gadgets of the Kuiper Belt that could want to classify as a planet that our image voltaic equipment might want to then have hunderds, per chance thousands of planets. it turns into so unwieldy that the definition would ought to adjust on the instantaneous. I consider the guidance of a particular length to the article yet in the journey that they had to make issues user-friendly they ought to also seem on the eccentricity of the orbit of the celestial body. For those of you who do not comprehend eccentricity relates how on the breaking point of a circle a lanets orbit is. The in direction of 0.00 and the closer the orbit is to a circle. having a seem on the orbits of Pluto, Charon and 2003 UB313, besides as the different TNO's that make up the Kuiper Belt, their orbits are far too oval (resembling comets) to be categorised as planets. take a seem on the hyperlink below for the comparative orbits and be conscious how both Plato/Charon and 2003UB313 bypass Neptune's orbit. in my opinion, this may mean that Ceres might want to change right into a planet yet Pluto/Charon and 2003UB313, a properly as all the different gadgets of the Kuiper Belt, would not. basically my 2 cents right here, no longer that the IAU is listening to me.

Answer 4

I wish almost 100 years ago I would have said I'm in charge here because I have one of them thar telescope thingies so people I choose can either make the world happy or summon chaos with a planet title! Oh, what power! lol~ Seriously though, I didn't vote for 'em

Answer 5

Yeah they do have WMD, so when a issue isn't decided, they can just blow the problem out of the sky. So if a problem happened in the vote of Pluto baaaaam, no more Pluto, no more problem.

Answer 6

It was formed in 1919 by astronomers so settle these issues...so astronomers put them in charge

Answer 7

Are you worried they might be harboring WMDs?