2006-08-24 12:25:56 · 11 answers · asked by BONES 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Other - Science
Astrologers are going to keep using the stars. Who cares? Pluto is still there. It didn't dissappear. They will keep doing what they have always done.
2006-08-24 12:31:54 · answer #1 · answered by dirtmerchant_12b 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If it comes to that, can the Astrologers tell us if every horoscope cast before 1781 was wrong? Uranus figures large in Astrology. Just read any of the crap published on the pseudo-science and they will tell you how it is associated with Aquarius. But it wasn't discovered until 1781. How did the 'ancients' so revered by astrology get it so wrong? Surely they must have realised something was missing?? The fact is, the IAA have recognised Pluto as a planet, and the criteria they have used means there will be a lot more planets in the solar systems, as more and more Kuiper belt and trans-neptune objects are assessed. Wither horoscopes then?
2016-03-27 04:08:28 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think that astrologers have much to do with Pluto anyway. I've never heard of Pluto being in Aquarius helping someone win the lottery, or whatever.
But, I mean it's still there. NASA haven't packed it away or anything. So if it does affect our collective destinies, I guess it'll just go right on orbiting and dragging fate about with it.
2006-08-24 12:31:02 · answer #3 · answered by leon_the_iguana 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They'll ignore Pluto like the government ignores the REAL number of unemployed people (when they put their phoney numbers out all the time...lol) If runaway debt and deficit spending can go unnoticed...well, a little thing like a planet shouldn't be hard to ignore by the astrologers.
2006-08-24 12:30:50 · answer #4 · answered by westgaliberty 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm confused... Why is Pluto no longer a planet? If not a planet, what is it? When did they make this decision?
2006-08-24 12:33:16 · answer #5 · answered by ŧťŠ4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Various forms of astrology have been around for thousands of years, Pluto was only discovered some 76 years ago....I don't think it will matter the least bit.
2006-08-24 12:31:52 · answer #6 · answered by mrjeffy321 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably look even farther into outerspace to find something that they don't know anything about. And start calling things that find something they know of. And then try in some way to connect it to this world or another possible world of one time where supposedly somebody was 60000000000000000000000billion years ago. And say "There was life there at one time possibly like our planet." That's what I think they will do.
2006-08-24 12:33:30 · answer #7 · answered by Al 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe they won't be as accurate as they used to be???
westgaliberty, they also ignore all the NEW employment in sole proprietorships and small business. The employment data the gov't presents is strictly from large corp numbers.
This would likely more than outpace your 'hidden' unemployment.
2006-08-24 12:34:01 · answer #8 · answered by newbie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Explain that the earth is also not a planet???
2006-08-24 12:38:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
umm not have a nineth planet?
2006-08-24 12:27:21 · answer #10 · answered by monkeyman19882003 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋