im not surprised cons dont know what bush says...........................?

Question

cons refuse to read.......they refuse to research........they refuse to pick up a newspaper.....dopes

heres the quote------------


Q But don't you believe that the threat that bin Laden posed won't truly be eliminated until he is found either dead or alive?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, as I say, we haven't heard much from him. And I wouldn't necessarily say he's at the center of any command structure. And, again, I don't know where he is. I -- I'll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him. I know he is on the run. I was concerned about him, when he had taken over a country. I was concerned about the fact that he was basically running Afghanistan and calling the shots for the Taliban.

Answer 1

And your point is?

The reason why a lot of conservatives don't pick up a newspaper is because it is all left-wing propaganda. But there are nonbias shows and magazines that I read and many other republicans.

Answer 2

I'm just a guy in Minnesota, but I pay attention. It doesn't seem likely that the Prez believed there were WMD's in Iraq or Saddam had anything to do with terrorism. So, there must be another reason we have troops there. I don't think it was just to control the oil fields of Iraq or his treatment of his people. No offense intended, but the Neo-con agenda may include exporting our form of democracy, but it really isn't interested in bringing peace to poor downtrodden people in Asia, unless the price was reasonable for the result...Iraq was and is a big deal (If the Administration thought this would be easy, they are really stupid, I don't think they were that stupid).

So, with all this in mind, why are we in the Middle East? My conclusion is that it is to provide a platform for further incursions into Iran and Syria. This is nothing as bad as WW2, but pretty big. I'm just a country boy watching from a corn field, but I am afraid that the next President will be forced to make that decision...might not be Bush, he doesn't have enough time. But given a reason or provocation, I can see a the next Prez enlarging the whole theatre, whether he is Democrat or Republican.

All the cheap shots we take at each other won't mean anything if things get that big. The body count will be much higher. I am a Liberal, but once we are in something, I'm willing to cooperate with all but the most rabid of the Conservatives. (If this was just a computer game, I would agree with the Neo-cons, but it isn't and I won't) The President needs to listen to people from both sides of the fence.

Answer 3

So what? Bin Laden certainly has lost what little control he ever had, and he's holed up (if he's even still alive). If he is, he will be captured or killed, same as Saddam and both of his murdering terrorist sons.

By the way, this "con" hears and sees the news at least 3 times a day, reads the local (liberal) paper and the far better editorial section of Investor's Business Daily, and even went to one (just one) Michael Moore movie. It's nice to know what the enemy is thinking, just like General Patton did. "Rommel, I read your book".

Answer 4

They just listen to Fox who has been caught lying, when they KNOW it was a lie and a court in Florida said it's ok for newscasters to lie!

Here is an actual quote, or quotes, in which he LIES again!

"Gosh, I just don't think I ever said I'm not worried about Osama bin Laden. It's kind of one of those exaggerations."
—Bush, during the final presidential debate, attempting to refute Kerry’s claim that the president boasted he was not concerned about Osama bin Laden.

"So I don't know where he is. You know, I just don't spend that much time on him... We haven't heard much from him. And I wouldn't necessarily say he's at the center of any command structure. And, again, I don't know where he is. I- I'll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him."
—Bush, answering a question about Osama bin Laden at a March 13, 2002 news conference.

And look at this gem, put out by FOX NEWS no less!!!

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/08/21/bush-on-911/

Answer 5

Bolt, I comprehend what you're saying, problem is those who're adversarial to the conflict do not. they imagine that if we pull out each little thing will bypass decrease back to the way it became. Then if a civil conflict erputs in Iraq they'll blame Bush (no longer congress, the democrats, or liberals who needed out). Its a win/win project for them, yet they don't comprehend that this gained't end the terrorists who hate our guts and need us lifeless. they'll proceed to evangelise anti-US propoganda, like they did previously Bush became president, like they did lower than Clinton. i became by no skill for the conflict in Iraq, the basically individual in my artwork position on the time who theory the data through the intelligence communities became weak. even with the undeniable fact that now that we are there, we ought to stay till the job is carried out and help our troops over there. I salute the warriors over there and desire you all go back effectively at the same time as the job is carried out. That way you gained't ought to wrestle yet another conflict because we pulled out too early.

Answer 6

I think the Pres. would rather OBL was never found, considering the closeness between the Bush family and the Bin Laden family.

Answer 7

It is the dumbness for which the world pays so dearly! Their stupidity is so harmful only because they are part of such a powerful country with ambitions of being the only Empire.

Answer 8

Nespapers and TV networks are definitely liberal. That's why we only listen to radio, where freedom reigns supreme.

If our president doesn't care about him, he must have his reasons. Now stop trying to stir the pot. I don't want to see you crying after you lose (again) in November.

Have you seen the last polls? We are tied and the Republican % of the votes keeps growing!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1689534/posts

Answer 9

If I couldn't form a complete sentence I don't think I would be calling conservatives dopes. Also, all conservatives don't support George W. Bush. Neocons support him.

Answer 10

You are so f-ingly blind and stupid you can't even comprehend that what Bush is saying is that we have effectively rendered Bin Laden useless, therefore, he is not his primary concern.

Look in the mirror, dope.