Radical islam wants sharia law around the world. Would you convert to live, accept subjugation or fight?

Question

Sharia law and the teachings of Mohamed say infidels must convert, pay a punitive tax or die.

Answer 1

In March, 2006, Muslim leaders in a meeting with Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs Minister Peter McGauran announced that they want to set up a separate Islamic court in Australia to deal specifically with Islamic divorces.

Mr McGauran and Attorney-General Phillip Ruddock rejected the idea in April. Mr McGauran said, "The law in this country is secular. There's a clear separation between religion and the law and Australia's laws apply equally to all citizens, regardless of their religion,"

A spokeswoman for Mr Ruddock added: "It would not be appropriate for the Government to establish a separate religious court."

Australia's Prime Minister, John Howard, announced on Wednesday, August 23, that extremists would face a crackdown. Howard indicated that he supported spies monitoring the nation’s mosques.

Treasurer Peter Costello, seen as heir apparent to Howard, suggested that if clerics did not accept that Australia was a secular state and its laws were made by parliament, they could be asked to leave. Costello said on national television, “If you want a country which has Sharia law or a theocratic state, then Australia is not for you ...If you can’t agree with parliamentary law, independent courts, democracy, and would prefer Sharia law and have the opportunity to go to another country which practises it, perhaps, then, that’s a better option,” Asked whether he meant radical clerics would be forced to leave, he said those with dual citizenship could possibly be asked move to the other country.

Education Minister Brendan Nelson later told reporters that Muslims who did not want to accept local values should “clear off”. “Basically, people who don’t want to be Australians, and they don’t want to live by Australian values and understand them, well then they can basically clear off,” he said.

This seems very clear. Australia will not tolerate Islamification!

The debate over Sharia law surfaced in Canada in 2003 when a Muslim group in Ontario proposed the arbitration of family disputes according to Islamic law. On May 26, 2005, the Quebec legislature passed a motion against allowing Sharia law to be used in the legal system.

It is not uncommon, therefore, that a country rules against changing its laws to cater to the Muslim community.

You might want to read the Islamic concept of Al-Taqiyah to infiltrate and destroy kafir countries by Dr. Walid Phares. Taqiyah is done to prevent the new converts from seeing the real face of Islam; at least until their faith or mental conditioning is strong enough to make them turn against their own country and people. The link is below.

Answer 2

As an American, I think we have already answered that question in Afganistan and Iraq - and possibly in Iran if they don't drop their nuclear enrichment program in the near future.

These psycho, Islamic Fascist terrorists don't respond to negotiations or diplomacy - they seem, however, to respond when military force is used. They are cowards and killers of the worst kind.

In answer to your question, the decision to fight Sharia law under a one world government has already been made - and the media and all the pacifists be damned! This is a war we MUST win if we are to remain a free nation.

Answer 3

As an American, i think of we've already responded that query in Afganistan and Iraq - and in all risk in Iran in the event that they do no longer drop their nuclear enrichment application interior the close to destiny. those psycho, Islamic Fascist terrorists do no longer respond to negotiations or international family members - they look, in spite of the shown fact that, to respond whilst militia stress is used. they are cowards and killers of the worst variety. In answer on your question, the determination to combat Sharia regulation under a one international government has already been made - and the media and all the pacifists be damned! this could be a conflict we could win if we are to stay a unfastened united states of america.

Answer 4

Yes you are right,they even asked here, in the UK for Sharia law to be introduced! Thank God it was denied! The bl**dy cheek of these people!!! They want world domination! I would rather die than convert. NEVER!!!

Answer 5

This is Bush Propaganda. Radical moslems want to leave them live quitely and peacefully in their countries. On the other side, Bush is the radical who wants his doctrine and multi national companies around the world and he is destroying nations around the world to get his goal.

Answer 6

I would die a true Christian.I would accept my home in heaven without 40 virgin schoolboys to service my fat old behind!I'd be happy just to be out of all this mess down here!

Answer 7

I would fight, but I know that this will never happen because people like freedom. I suppose that the "God" of these crazy Muslims doesn't want people to choose to follow him, but wants slaves who are forced to follow "Him."

Answer 8

My wife is Muslim and I am not. I would not convert, nor would she want me to--I would have to do what I was forced to do--fight. I know I would have my wife at my side.

Answer 9

you seem to know nothing about islam muslims are peacful and their main aim is to live in peace , you are just talking about freedom, isnot freedom of religions included in your democracy,second prophet mohammad(peace be upon him) says are the most fair beliefs in thewhole world althoughyou are completely free not to be ruled by it and we are notwho want to persuade others to live with our beliefs please stop watching tv especially those channels where bush appears in and find something else to do or read about islam before you enter a discussion you know nothing about.........best wishes

Answer 10

Fight to my dying breath. Even for people who were too afraid to fight for their own pathetic selves.