English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What else would you call the planning and execution of attacks on the West by terrorist cells made up of Jihadists? TWH 08242006

2006-08-24 09:27:38 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

This is not a political Q and it certainly is not spinned from any side of the political spectrum. You who characterize my Q as such or answer in ways that seek to potray the idea of conspiraciies as a label or propennsity of one party or the other have lost the objectivity I am seeking in an answer. Please play politics in the Politics subcategory not here where I am rising above "dirty" politics. TWH 08272006

2006-08-26 20:20:01 · update #1

Another example of the existence of conspiracies. Adm Poindexter and Col Oliver North conspired to trade arms for money & hostages from Iran in order to use the money to fund the Contras in Nicaragua.

2006-08-29 04:53:29 · update #2

7 answers

If Diane Sawyer, Larry King, or Peter Jennings say it didn't happen, or they don't say that it DID happen, it's a conspiracy theory. If they DO say something happened, it's a planned event, not a conspiracy. The word conspiracy is now used to ridicule those that the mainstream wishes to discredit other possibilities.

Today, most non-thinkers tend to believe what others tell them rather than to think for themselves. Also, at least in the US we have a failed educational system that has failed to teach people how to think constructively and how to develop logical associations from seemingly unrelated criteria. Even final exam questions are multiple choice. If the potential answer isn't given, then it's not a potential answer.

Therefore, for many people the seemingly logical conclusion is that those who have serious misgivings about the official 9/11 story make no sense. They legitimately do not have the training or foundation to connect the correct dots or to move beyond the logic paths that they've been assimilated within since childhood.

2006-08-24 09:42:33 · answer #1 · answered by shorebreak 3 · 2 0

Anyone who studies world events knows that conspiracies occur all the time. The CIA's abortive plans to assassinate Fidel Castro, any coup d'etat, or any major terrorist attack are genuine conspiracies.

The 'conspiracy theory' industry is a bit different in that such theorists usually state that there is some overarching body that oversees world events and directs everything from behind the scenes. They often blame the Illuminati, aliens, the New World Order, or some other group founded in nothing more than paranoid fantasy. These are the types written off as imaginary by any sensible person.

2006-08-24 09:35:19 · answer #2 · answered by Huh? 7 · 1 0

The movie brings up exciting issues that absolutely everyone became speedy to seem faraway from in the initiating because absolutely everyone needed solutions. Why did that third WTC construction bypass down so long after the towers were hit? and how did it bypass down if it wasn't hit through a plane? The pictures brings up alot of sturdy factors. yet no it would not answer something. even with the undeniable fact that it sort of feels to indicate to an obtrusive answer. i have considered a particular on PBS Frontline that regarded into the hijackers and some the position catholic some the position muslim some weren't linked with a faith what all of them had in common became that they got here from wealthy households. What exceeded off to that tale? the authorities both is popular with precisely what exceeded off and could no longer say for any form of causes or they do no longer comprehend and do not care. they basically considered it finally as an opertunity to be opertunists. i don't believe of the movie explains something. I easily have considered a great number of images and conversations with those who comprehend the construction and how they could be taken down and the common tale that the media gave up telling alongside time in the past makes the least experience of each and each of the tale's out their. per chance they need us to be suspicious and in worry.

2016-11-27 19:30:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The liberal agenda includes making ALL decisions of the Bush administration seem incorrect or unjustifiable. Since logical fallacy, negative 30 second media blurbs, and partisan grandstanding have become the most effective tools in their arsenal, I do not see the democrats seating a president in the upcoming election and given today's politcal climate, the negative ads and bashing should prove to be more vigorous than ever.
No matter who is elected, from whatever party, nearly half the population will remain unsatisfied. If only those same unsatisfied people were as politically active as they are vocal.....Hmmmm

2006-08-24 09:53:46 · answer #4 · answered by ©2009 7 · 0 1

About all those conspiracies that say it was planned by the US Government you need to check the debunkers sites. The folks who say the US Government did it have stories that are more full of holes than Swiss cheese.

2006-08-30 02:25:45 · answer #5 · answered by namsaev 6 · 0 1

9/11 is over give it up people I am sad that people died but its been yearzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

2006-08-24 09:33:10 · answer #6 · answered by omega101 3 · 0 1

conspiracy theories are imginary conspiracies are true !

2006-08-27 11:14:09 · answer #7 · answered by imhm2004 5 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers