No, we are not safer with bin Laden free. But if the US does find him, I think they'll just kill him on the spot, making him a martyr as well as a hero.
2006-08-24 09:26:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
While it's upsetting that bin Laden is still out there, on some level it makes sense for the President and others not to mention him too often. If they state publicly that he's not a threat and that they're not worried about him, it lowers the perception of him as a leader in the Islamic world.
Of course, this theory only works if they're also working diligently behind the scenes to get him, and there's not much evidence to support that. So it's probably more along the lines of "declare victory and give up", a pretty standard response from most politicians.
2006-08-24 09:26:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Corbett 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
right here is something you probable have not seen previously: As evidenced with the help of his deafening silence of overdue, Osama Bin encumbered is probable bodily, if no longer mentally, incapacitated. In his final video, he strikes in basic terms 3-a million/2 minutes; the rest is a nevertheless image. i do no longer think of he's even lucid distinctive the time. i think of the final attack bodily devastated him, and his ideas is going. Now, that is a good element for the Western international. With a figurehead on the helm of the terrorist circulation, no longer something dynamic could be completed. they'd't insult Bin encumbered with the help of having somebody else take administration. it would be like Christians telling the Pope he's the day previous's information. With a trapped and crippled Bin encumbered, they probable even have not tried to plot yet another attack on U.S. soil. right here is one element we do understand: Bin encumbered has on the spot his protectors to kill him, fairly than enable him be captured, if an attack is ever waged against their hiding place. i think we've universal the place Bin encumbered is for a minimum of four years. although if, we are patiently biding our time for that one, elusive risk (alongside with a social gathering, or some replace of their ordinary) to seize him alive. The U.S. has surveillance innovations that have by no ability even been publicly marketed. all of us understand that the U.S. has satellites which could examine a automobile plate from orbit; i come across it confusing to have confidence we've not fairly discovered OBL. speaking of secret surveillance innovations, i does not be shocked if the U.S. has even devised the thank you to "chemically tag" OBL, or get a transmitter into his camp. There are transmitters a third the dimensions of an eye fixed fixed battery. it would desire to be everywhere. He would desire to have even swallowed one. (keep in mind each and all the loopy techniques the CIA had to kill Castro? think of how lots extra better the surveillance innovations at the instant are, 40 years later!) OBL is getting the justice he merits. he's compelled to stay in hassle, just about without companionship. He has scant leisure, and that i doubt they are shuttling any "convenience women persons" to maintain him from being lonely. In due time, we will nab him.
2016-12-17 16:36:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh shut up! This is sooooo old! You & people like you are the ones who are the disgrace to the American race! You are so full of hatred you cant see straight! Just dont forget one thing, its hatred that flew those planes into those buildings killing thousands of innocents, someones family member, mine included....
Turning on your own, bashing your own, puts you in the same category as those terrorists, and makes people feel unsafe!
2006-08-24 09:32:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by Katz 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are disgraceful Americans but you need a mirror to see one.
Which is more important? A tired old man that we made hide under a rock or the millions that Saddam was having murdered.
2006-08-24 09:25:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Wolfpacker 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Does it make YOU feel better to ask the question? Take a deep breath now. There, all better. I won't mention how I think YOU are the national disgrace. You just need some rest right now.
2006-08-24 09:25:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yup. I agree with you. They'd have a better chance to capture him if the U.S. didn't invade Iraq. They could have used those resources to get Bin Laden.
2006-08-24 09:25:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by tyrone b 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes they are. bin Laden is the one RESPONSIBLE for 911, but Cons choose to ignore that fact and blame it on Iraq. They are traitors to America.
2006-08-24 09:25:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Kookoo Bananas 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
fuack u 2 cause bush is doin the best he can. i cant deny that i wish someone who was more suited to run the country, but since we have bush now, why not make the best of it.
2006-08-24 09:35:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by ~*[{BasKeT CasE}]*~ 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
the fact that bin laden tried to kill him by ramming planes into his house (white house) then i would say he is a dumn texan.
2006-08-24 09:32:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by antho c 2
·
0⤊
1⤋