why don't we destroy iran?while we destroy all middle-east?

Question

we can do it,can't we?we r more powerful that iran,aren't we?then why....?we can get iran in our hands..

Answer 1

Are we making enemies faster than we can kill them?

Answer 2

Iran is a superpower right now. Going into war with them would start a so called Domino effect. First we attack them, Then we will Have Persia join Iran which then launches Isreal into war with Iran. So then we are battling from two sides and have them cournered, but there is the threat of there nukes and also China would jump in and attack America because they want to Be the superpower right now. That would then send us into battling on two fronts. We would have England on our side along with India, but all three of them have nukes as well. The world is in a stalemate right now. We should just continue to buy our oil from Russia and what we pull from Alaska and Suadi Arabia. Suadi would also join Iran now that I think about it.

Answer 3

Military is so stretched out right now. They can barely handle Iraq. How much more with Iran that's a lot more powerful. Peacetalks is the way to go.

Answer 4

I dont think mass-destruction is at all the solution to the problem with either country. To kill off thousands of locals and our own people for the sake of some battle over oil or whatever it may be currently is just obscene. It just shows how incompent people have become.

Answer 5

You are Hezbollah???? Your narrow view of the world, our roll in it, makes me wonder if you are Hezbollah ready to destroy America,, or maybe you are just a sick neo-Nazi or skin head? Really, what would give you or anyone the right to destroy another culture? Are you pro Holocaust? Race cleansing? Perhaps you need to seek help?

Answer 6

Hmmm. You are being sarcastic, aren't you? Perhaps you are reacting to the answers some people give like....nuke 'em. When it comes right down to actuality, I do not think those people would actually use the nuclear bomb. It is just talk.

A lot of what happens in regards to build up of weapons, military exercises on land and see, etc. is just puffery. Sometimes a country's leader weighs his options and decides to invade another country. Nowadays, it is more popular to send in special forces than a fleet of warships and bombers.

I think that Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khameini truly believes that he is Allah's representative on Earth to rid the world of fitnah (disbelief in Allah).

On August 21, Ayatollah Khameini said on Iranian TV that Iran had "made its own decision" and would "continue its path".

Furthermore, Mohammad Saeedi, the deputy head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation, Mohammad Saeedi, said that suspension of uranium enrichment was "no longer possible". He also said a heavy water production plant at Arak would become operational "in the near future".

On August 22 Ali Larijani, hand delivered Iran's 21-page response to UNSC 1696 the package of incentives to dissuage Iran from uranium enrichment with uranium hexafluoride gas in its Russian-built 1,000-megawatt reactor at Bushehrand Natanz. Iran's top nuclear negotiator said that Tehran was ready to enter "serious negotiations" over its disputed nuclear program but did not say whether it was willing to suspend uranium enrichment — the West's key demand. This was because the West had offered many economic incentives.

Iran is a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, though it has not ratified two additional protocols to the International Atomic Energy Agency's Program 93 + 2, which is designed to prevent states from developing nuclear weapons covertly.

On August 31 the UNSC will set economic and diplomatic sanctions against Iran if it continues to enrich uranium. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khameini avers that Iran has a right to have nuclear weapons. Leaders of the Iranian hard-line regime, believe they have a direct line to God, and they'll do whatever 'divine inspiration' requires them to do. Talking to them is pointless.

On August 19, Iran launched a large-scale area, sea and ground exercise he maneuver, the Blow of Zolfaghar (the sword used by Imam Ali), which involved 12 divisions, army Chinook helicopters, unmanned planes, parachutists, electronic war units and special forces. Iran's state-run television reported that the new anti-aircraft system was tested "to make Iranian air space unsafe for our enemies."

On Sunday, August 20, in the Kashan desert about 250 kilometers southeast of the capital of Tehran, Iran tested the Saegheh missile which has a range of between 80 to 250 kilometers. Saegheh means lightning in Farsi. (The language of Iran is not Arabic and Iranians are not Arabs.)
Iran's arsenal also contains the Shahab-3 missile, which means "shooting star" in Farsi, and is capable of carrying a nuclear warhead. It has a range of more than 2,000 kilometers and can reach Israel and US forces in the Middle East.

Iran's military test-fired a series of missiles during large-scale war games in the Persian Gulf in March and April, including a missile it claimed was not detectable by radar that can use multiple warheads to hit several targets simultaneously.

The Iranian news service Al-Borz, predicted that on the first anniversary of Iranian President Ahmadinejad's government, in late August 2006, Ahmadinejad is expected to announce what the news service called Iran's "nuclear birth."

In addition, an August 23, 2006 article about Iran's reply to the incentives proposal, that was posted on the Iranian Foreign Ministry-affiliated website , implied that Iran's nuclear technology had already reached the point of no return: "...

The following are excerpts from the Al-Borz report:

"It is expected that the first anniversary of the forming of the ninth government will be the date of the Ahmadinejad government's 'nuclear birth.'

"... Together with [the celebration of] the anniversary of the forming of the ninth cabinet, the president of the country [Mahmoud Ahmadinejad] will hold his third press conference... where he will answer questions from journalists from Iran and from abroad.

"In addition to detailing the activities of the government at the end of [its first] year, the head of the government [i.e. Ahmadinejad] will officially present Iran's positions on: economic and cultural matters, the nuclear dossier, the activities of nuclear research centers, and developments in the region."

Answer 7

Ask yourself why Obama didn't want to produce more oil?The answer is in his heritage of being a Muslim & wanting U.S. stoops to protect his Muslim friends.Without our need for their oil our troops could leave.

Answer 8

They are people just like us... But the heat will make you do some crazy sh*t. Give them some a/c and they'll be like, "I was gonna what?? Nah...." hahaha
Destroying something just means we can't understand it. In other words, that would make us completely ignorant.

Answer 9

That's a really scary thought. Think of all of their nuclear powered allies that will be pissed off if we do such a thing. We could be committing suicide.

Answer 10

just make sure you take our troops out first! after that there's nothing/no one useful left!

F the oil we can just drive solar-powered cars or electric

Answer 11

Iran is probably next.