Do you beleive in a US government conspiracy for the 9/11?

Question

I found this web site that details a lot of facts about the pre-9/11 horrible event.
Now, I'm not saying this is real nor false. This document is a conglomeration of facts, and it shows that too much coincidence between what the US gvt has done before 9/11 and after.
Before you say:"What an idiot not to beleive our gvt" I want you to open your minds, expand the possibilities of an event of such drastic scale, and think outside the box. You, like me, should not beleive what is in the web site that i attached, but should at least carry doubt. There are too many verifiable facts in this documents, the facts are all out there, you just need to put them together to realize that a conspiracy from the US gvt is VERY probable. That terrorists are not alone but work with the us gvt as well.
Read the link below, then tele me what you think, do you agree with what is said? and objections or denial of fact?

http://www.321energy.com/editorials/deruijter/deruijter081806.html

Answer 1

I do believe in conspiracies, I think they are around more than we have any idea...I also think that if you bend and omit enough facts you can make Barney look like a mass murderer. I do not believe there was a 9/11 conspiracy b/c of the arguments for there being a conspiracy. The people who would have gotten richer were already rich as hell, more power only gives you more problems. Most conspiracists think that Bush is a moron, well if there is a conspiracy , he is a hell of a lot smarter than all of us. And if he is that smart wouldn't he be smart enough to have planned for how "badly" this whole situation is going?? There is not a conspiracy and it is sickening to think that destroying 3000+ lives could ever be worth whatever would be gotten out of this conspiracy

Answer 2

I'm going to skip all this ink, and the suggested website, and go straight to your question. But before I do, I will state that the question seems disingenuous. By now, most people in the country figure so.

Irrespective of vociferous pro government types. We're still a large population with quite varying opinions. It has become evident it isn't smart to voice those opinions. Government generally exists as a ' surface maintenance ' entity only. Too, and I have heard this as a technical, political term: violent impotence, figures in not so low profile retalliation.

What goes in American applies to all other political entities. Inclusive of communist regimes. We are now a seriously divided nation both as a government and as a people.

Opportunism is rife as at no other time in history. Yes, I think elements within the United States government were fundamentally responsible for the perceived attacks. Sufficient latitude was afforded the present to invoke ' plausible deniability '.

( I.e. : It's okay, you can say you didn't know. )

What I don't understand, is that how could so many people from the middle east be ' imported ' so systematically into the United States, kept under such tight control like everyone else, have this happen, and expect it to go unnoticed? Is the average citizen held so cheaply?

Probably because a great deal of stock is placed in repressive measures. The type of technology now in place absolutely not only rules out so called terrorists, but makes conventional warfare a thing of the past.

A kid who's spent any time with video games could knock out divisions of troops inclusive of air support with little or no trouble at all.

This same capability is extant with practically any government on the planet. So who are we kidding, here? Isn't this what this is about? What your question should actually be about?

To hide the fact? Even if it cost a hand full of flunky stooges who
' happened ' to commandeer a few aircraft, not to mention the loss of the lives of those on board, and all those people in all those buildings? Not just building one and two?

This isn't simply barbaric or criminal, it is malevolent. Deeply so.
Not simply a topic of coffee table conversation.

I hope I've addressed your question sufficiently.

Answer 3

I don't believe in conspiracy theories as a rule but I recently came across a couple of videos about 9/11 that do raise some disturbing questions - particularly in relation to what happened at the Pentagon. But, as with most events, facts can be "cherry picked" to bolster a particular argument. If you are looking for government involvement in 9/11 I would seriously suggest asking which government. Given what I've read I would suggest that an element of the Saudi Arabian intelligence services may have been involved - although you will find no concrete evidence of this anywhere.

Answer 4

If they haven't instigated it, they definitely knew beforehand, like FDR knew about Pearl Harbor at least three months before. The Bush junta has (highly likely) fostered the conditions that the attack went on as planned and that it was successful. Well knowing that such an attack would rally the populace behind them, they could nothing but win. The Bush junta was until that day bland and nothing but a standing joke; an embarrassment in the international community and domestically a laughing stock. 9/11 saved them and therefore it was a blessing. The events that let up to that day helped the attack. On that day there were several exercises going on that removed all but 16 fighter jets from the continental U.S. and 15 of those stayed firmly on the ground. One jet was scrambled but at a time when it was for certain that he couldn't stop anything anymore.

Is the Bush junta guilty of the murder of 3000+ Americans? YES!

Answer 5

Yes.

I know for a fact that Bill Clinton was the one behind that 9/11 attack. Prove otherwise.

It was planned on his watch.

He and the Ds put a wall between the FBI and CIA preventing the information needed to pass from one to the other.

He and the Ds gutted the US human intelligence operations during the 90s.

The training of pilots happened on his watch.

He turned down OBL's capture several times during his administration.

He did practically nothing to Al Qaeda during his watch.

He was either incompetent or in bed with OBL as well as Monica.

Answer 6

Being in denial doesn't help. To debunk a contradictory theory out of hand, because you don't want it to be so or because you are so brainwashed into thinking " We are the good guys." is blatantly stupid.
if I told you, that not only did FDR know in advance, but actually took steps to force Japan to attack Pearl Harbour, would you think Me a conspiracy nut?
The abuse of prisoners and even murder committed by The US and allies proves that all peoples have the capacity for evil. open your eyes and accept what is happening.

Answer 7

People like to create conspiracy theories to explain a larger web of things that they don't really have an intimate understanding of. Although there may have been some failures to communicate within the government, that doesn' mean that they conspired to allow things to happen.

Answer 8

My concern with this idea is that George Bush would have to pull a "Reichstag Fire" scenario to try and foist an American brand of fascism.

George may be a lot of negative things, but I cannot agree to that he feels this is acceptable behavior for any US President

Answer 9

It is very possible, but if it is true we will probably never know. There are some really bad people in this world, and a lot of them live in the same country we live in.

Answer 10

Yes. It was the very first thing I though of when the first plane hit the tower, and before the second one came in.