am afraid my dear...v r using very polite words for the blooody jerk daryl hair...hes so cruel and evil...he is a black spot on the game...definately he took money for all this....but IC thinks that only the players and specially aisan players can cheat and umpires are angels....huh...but look what IC is doing...and look what ex australian players are saying...it sall recism i am afraid....ICC might ban inzi for 8 matches...for putting the match to an end...but they might overlook what the umpires did..they are seeing the end mo re closely than the means.....it has 2b asked from that blody cheat that whom did u c tempering the ball....and if u dint se anybody then y th hell did u award penalty runs....and even then when u saw paki team not coming outta ground...u shud have gone 2 inzi and told him that well..if u dont come..i will award it 2 englanad...but he didnt do any of the above...coz he never wanted to,,,,he wanted the same what happened.....and sorry 2 comment on simon taufel's comments that he knows the aws better than any1....had that been the caase...he would not have given inzi run out in faisalabad as that was a complete matter of law..............HATE HAIR
its definatley daryl hair at fault....had temparing been the case inzi would have used 2 fast bowlers instead of kaneria on the other end....do u expect kaneria 2 reverse swing th ball? when cook got out...ball wis with Hair...and just 3 ovrs later he found the ball tempered...the point is that when cook got out...ball was rversing...y didnt the bloody hair se at that time that something has been done2 the ball....it is quite possible that he himslf did it...what pakistan did was just a result of hair's decision..therefor before deciding why pakistan pulled outta match...ICC must look into hair's matter...if he is proven guilty ..pakistan is automatially free of charge!!!
2006-08-24 16:55:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Zuhair-from-pakistan 4
·
2⤊
4⤋
The Pakistan cricket team management need to look hard at the way they play cricket as ball tampering has been a problem for them for a long time.The spirit of fair play should always be a main part of the game and attacking the umpires is not cricket.
If they were treated unfairly the team management could have logged an appeal later in the day and it could have been sorted out after the match was completed.Attacking personally an umpire is the most disgraceful thing a cricketer can do.
2006-08-24 20:03:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by Denny Crane 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
All these answers talking about evidence and proof etc totally miss the point. The law states that "in the opinion of the umpire" the ball has been tampered with he should take action. He doesn't actually have to see a penknife in action. The umpire regularly checks the ball, and obviously felt that there had been some artificial assistance to increase damage to the ball.
2006-08-24 21:13:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Roger B 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
pakistan cricket team, if they were so innocent why didnt they just carry on regardless, try and win the test,then later lodge a formal complaint to the match referee about darell hairs conduct????? Pakistan have been the centre of ball tampering allegations for a long time now so maybe they are upset they have been found out!!!!!
2006-08-24 08:22:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by hellraisersteve 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
I'm waiting to see what evidence Darrell Hair has to prove there was ball tampering and then make up my mind.
2006-08-24 08:18:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Gavin T 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think Hair is biased against Asian teams but also Pakistan shouldn't have just walked off like that - it really does not help their cause.
2006-08-24 09:47:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jeremy H 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
hair because first of all he is an umpire not a policemen so he should not raise allegations on anyone. u have have sufficient proof before u can raise a question on somebosys integrity.
2006-08-24 09:22:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by sahooanurag 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
I think Darrell Hair...
2006-08-24 17:05:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by ShaH 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Pakistan. They know the rules, you have an allotted time to get out there and commence play and they tried to call his bluff and he didn't back down. They lose.
2006-08-24 14:46:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Bru 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Darrell Hair is a cheating racist paedophile.
2006-08-24 09:30:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by vaivagabundo 5
·
2⤊
4⤋