My dilemma is that for the time my fiancee was alive, I felt like we could work out differences and get married even though it was three years after we called it off. I always kept this in mind because she kept the ring. What do you think?
2006-08-24 08:09:37 · 8 answers · asked by powxmansal 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
No, once it is called off, you are no longer engaged
2006-08-24 08:15:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are not engaged nor have you been since it was called off. The ring should have been returned to you, although I don't know what you would do with it. If I got engaged to someone I sure wouldn't want a second hand unsuccessful engagement ring.
2006-08-24 15:18:22 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since it was mutually called off, she should have given you the ring back. Any time for any reason, the guy should get the ring back in my opinion. No, you should not say you are engaged once it is called off.
2006-08-24 15:13:21 · answer #3 · answered by Gowgirl52 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Once you call off the engagement you are no longer engaged. Just because she kept the ring doesn't mean anything other than she enjoys jewelry.
2006-08-24 15:15:31 · answer #4 · answered by sugarcarat 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I don't you are still engaged because it was called off. And that's strange she kept the ring. Does she wear it on her ring finger?
2006-08-24 15:16:50 · answer #5 · answered by fibr 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if the engagement is off, the ring should go back to the buyer...besides, what female would want to keep a ring with a broken promise?
2006-08-24 15:29:27 · answer #6 · answered by Dizzie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was mutually called off, therefore not engaged anymore.
2006-08-24 15:25:37 · answer #7 · answered by jim_619_858 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
duh, what have you said in the first phrase of your queston?
2006-08-24 15:16:40 · answer #8 · answered by Alysen C 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋