You may be a Scorpio but that doesn't automatically mean it's your ruling planet. The ruling planet is the one that rules your ascendant, or rising sign (whichever planet is on the eastern horizon at your time of birth) and this is determined by what time of day you were born. So for example if your ascendant is Gemini - the ruler would be Mercury, or if is Libra - then the ruler would be Venus. These combinations define our unique personalities.
2006-08-28 03:11:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
My mom and I were just discussing the same thing. My unborn son is due to be a Scorpio, so I don't really appreciate them knocking this planet off the maps at this time..
Astrologically, I think it should change nothing. Pluto is considered a generational planet, and it takes a long while to show its effects on humankind. We will still feel its forces, even if scientists claim it isn't a planet by definition.
However, Pluto the God probably isn't too happy about this. He is gonna break out ol' Cerberus.
2006-08-24 08:04:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's still a "dwarf planet". Personally I don't believe in astrology, but if it were true, whatever affect Pluto had before, it would continue to have now. Don't worry! It doesn't actually affect Pluto itself just because scientists made up a new rule about what they're going to call a planet.
2006-08-24 08:26:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by mj_indigo 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, technically Scorpio is ruled jointly by Mars and Pluto. Before 1930, no one even knew there was a Pluto. I imagine nothing much will change, though. Pluto will probably remain a co-ruler of Scorpio despite it's unceremonious demotion to "dwarf planet" status.
Pluto may even be more mysterious now. It always had a secretive, rebelious streak... Perhaps it wasn't comfortable being part of the planet club anyhow.
2006-08-24 08:28:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by wakeupandbefree 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Just because scientists no longer consider Pluto a planet, that won't change how Pluto is viewed from an astrological standpoint. There's another "planet" that's referred to in astrology, but this one isn't widely popular. Look up Chiron in relation to astrology and you'll see what I mean.
2006-08-24 08:29:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by Erin 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Astrology is not a science but a set of superstitions and has nothing to do with astronomy. So what difference should it make what astronomners say about Pluto? What did astrology say was the ruling planet in Scorpio before Pluto was discovered in 1930? Go back to that!
2006-08-24 08:27:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by bagatelle 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
The lose of Pluto as a planet will have no effect on Astrology, just as the discovery of Pluto had no affect on it in the 1930s, before which Pluto ruled nothing at all. It will have the same effect on your horoscope no matter what we call it planet or dwarf planet.
2006-08-24 08:26:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Savrenzius 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You will be demoted to amoeba status. haha, J/K
Perhaps the Pluto that we know isn't the planet that the ancient astrologers were referring to. Maybe we were mistaken and they were referring to another world out there that we weren't aware of at the time. Have your horoscopes been accurate? Probably not. Research your horoscope and look for a heavenly body that fits in with your life, luck, etc. That is your REAL planet.
2006-08-29 02:44:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by brainzrgood4u 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Scorpio Planet
2016-09-30 23:18:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by richberg 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Before 1930 Pluto was undiscovered. Where did they put the Scorpio's then? I guess that is where you go now.
What about the other dwarf planets that are being added, maybe instead of one planet you get two dwarf planets.
2006-08-24 08:16:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by Info_Please 4
·
0⤊
0⤋