English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

23 answers

i'd say cailfornia, but too many earthquakes. i'd say florida, but to many hurricanes, so i'll stick where i live, chicago

2006-08-24 07:16:50 · answer #1 · answered by Hugh Jass 2 · 0 0

Busselton Australia

2006-08-24 14:21:04 · answer #2 · answered by gauthier613 3 · 0 0

Bismark, North Dakota

2006-08-24 14:20:45 · answer #3 · answered by T 4 · 0 0

Seattle

2006-08-24 14:15:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Zurich

2006-08-24 14:17:32 · answer #5 · answered by dick_coxnbutz 2 · 0 0

Hanoi

2006-08-24 14:19:43 · answer #6 · answered by D 4 · 0 0

Poway

2006-08-24 14:17:30 · answer #7 · answered by Joyce W 2 · 0 0

Vancouver, BC

2006-08-24 14:16:15 · answer #8 · answered by Bryn T 3 · 0 0

Houston, Texas baby!

2006-08-24 14:15:58 · answer #9 · answered by headstr8 3 · 0 0

maybe Altlantis...no, I'm kidding, I wouldn't want to live under the sea, too scary. It would be somewhere in Canada, I'd really have to think about which one.

2006-08-24 14:21:58 · answer #10 · answered by feathereafter 4 · 0 0

Dandridge, TN - the garden spot of the world!

2006-08-24 14:16:19 · answer #11 · answered by tnmtngirl 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers