i'd say cailfornia, but too many earthquakes. i'd say florida, but to many hurricanes, so i'll stick where i live, chicago
2006-08-24 07:16:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Hugh Jass 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Busselton Australia
2006-08-24 14:21:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by gauthier613 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bismark, North Dakota
2006-08-24 14:20:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by T 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Seattle
2006-08-24 14:15:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Zurich
2006-08-24 14:17:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by dick_coxnbutz 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hanoi
2006-08-24 14:19:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by D 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Poway
2006-08-24 14:17:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by Joyce W 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Vancouver, BC
2006-08-24 14:16:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bryn T 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Houston, Texas baby!
2006-08-24 14:15:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by headstr8 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
maybe Altlantis...no, I'm kidding, I wouldn't want to live under the sea, too scary. It would be somewhere in Canada, I'd really have to think about which one.
2006-08-24 14:21:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by feathereafter 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dandridge, TN - the garden spot of the world!
2006-08-24 14:16:19
·
answer #11
·
answered by tnmtngirl 5
·
0⤊
0⤋