Yea, One hour nap after lunch would be awesome. It has nothing to do with going to bed early or late. my body simply needs time to digest lunch.
2006-08-24 06:13:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. They say power-napping is good, but I've never been a napper. It usually takes me at least 1/2 hour to fall asleep, so an hour's naptime during the day would be more an annoyance to me than a relief.
2006-08-24 06:27:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by HoneySuite 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, but I would work one hour longer if it meant I got a couple hours off on Fridays.
2006-08-24 06:07:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would work an hour longer if they translated that into a four day work week, that is have Fridays or MOndays off.
2006-08-24 06:08:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by answerhog 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hell No! In fact I'd rather go into work an hour earlier and skip lunch to get out of there earlier!
2006-08-24 06:09:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sure, as long as the nap was four hours long...hehe
2006-08-24 06:09:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by markus 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no. I would rather sleep for an hour after work, or on my lunch hour in my car.
2006-08-24 06:07:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by ape0402 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. If you're that tired something is wrong or you should go to bed earlier at night
2006-08-24 06:08:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by jasperJ 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nooo I wanna go home sooner
2006-08-24 06:08:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by crazygt05 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope.
2006-08-24 06:08:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jt 2
·
1⤊
0⤋