I agree. Use child molesters, rapists and murderers instead. There is no need for them in society anyway.
2006-08-24 05:42:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
James Mccutchen
2006-08-24 05:34:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sallyann Barnes
2006-08-24 05:52:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by sallyann0030 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nikki Roberts
2006-08-24 05:38:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Nikki R 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maui Ballard
2006-08-24 06:04:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by annevragejoe318 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Some or how we have to test medicines and such things and it is not possible to do on man before a sucess in such tests. Live and let live is my slogan but human being is first. I like animals and even I don't take non-veg.
2006-08-24 05:37:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by AJIT LEO 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bridget C. Freeman
2006-08-24 05:37:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by Brig 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Teresa
2006-08-24 07:34:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by baci_kissess 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No thanks.
My life was saved in 1995 due to experimental drugs that are now readily available. Although I am against needless killing of animals, when this is the only way to advance scientific medical research, I approve.
2006-08-24 05:35:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't no.I agree that it is crule that ppl use animals to test stuff we use but if they stop doing that animal thing then what r they going to use next.They mite use us!!!I think I will take my chances.JENNA A.
2006-08-24 05:53:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋