I would suggest ONLY if it is Superior to
Israeli or Hezbollah , or both ......
2006-08-24 03:13:39 · 6 answers · asked by Moonlite gambler 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Any U.N. force would be ineffective. I cite the past attempts to maintain peace in Kosovo, Serbia, and the list goes on and on. The U.N. isn't useful at doing much of anything except making it's own members filthy rich. And I mean FILTHY.
Have a great day!!!
2006-08-24 03:18:15 · answer #1 · answered by Coo coo achoo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I totally support the UN........not just bcos I work for them.........but as our national government or military force...........they also work for the protection of the world. They never support one country....they want all the countries come together and work for the development of the world as a whole.
Think the world as a country and the countries in the world as the states in a country. Don't you think that the states in a country has differences between them. But the central or federal government tries to keep them together with peace to represent the whole country. The same way UN tries to keep all the countries together in peace and build a better world to live for all human beings not just the whites or rich.
I hope this time UN achieves what they desired to...
2006-08-24 10:25:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anil A 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The UN has failed in every peacekeeping mission throughout the world, except maybe the Green Line in Cyprus.
2006-08-24 10:17:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it won't be useful and Hezbollah will continue to re-arm, disrepect everything and have contempt for the world.
2006-08-24 10:16:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. This whole truce thing doesn't solve anything.
2006-08-24 10:15:19 · answer #5 · answered by Darby 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont thing it will be useful, I feel their live's will be in jeopardy.
Njoy....
2006-08-24 10:15:27 · answer #6 · answered by sanghvir 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋