Classical, traditional, and medieval Astrologers do not use the outer planets: Uranus, Neptune and Pluto in their delineations, modern Astrologers utilize them.
Whether or not Pluto is classified as planet or not is irrelevant to modern practitioners of Astrology. The qualities associated with Pluto: power, control, transformation and the destroying or reforming urge, are still applicable whether it is called a planet or an ice dwarf.
Scorpio is co-ruled by Mars and Pluto. That will not change.
Astrologers use other bodies in addition to planets in our calculations, such as asteroids. Ceres, an asteroid, one of the bodies they may call a planet, already is in use by modern Astrologers. Some other asteroids currently being used are Juno, Pallas, and Vesta. Chiron, a centaur, is also extensively in use.
In summary, it makes do difference to what Pluto is classified as, the characteristics associated with it still stand.
2006-08-24 06:44:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by astroleolady 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would consider that Mars was the ruling planet in the first place, before the discovery of Pluto.
It is interesting to view the charts the way (or as close as we can) the ancients did.
2006-08-24 15:52:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by wolfstar 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Everyone should just rotate on notch over on the dial.
To the left, of course.
2006-08-24 09:55:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It will still be as relevant as ever.
Believers will still believe, rational people won't care about the impact of this decision.
2006-08-24 09:52:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ralfcoder 7
·
0⤊
0⤋