the decission in the oval test match
2006-08-24 02:29:55 · 15 answers · asked by vishalbakshi2000 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
I THINK HE IS IN SERIOUS TROUBLE.
2006-08-24 06:07:40 · answer #1 · answered by A.R.RAJA 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah he was damn wrong.
He is an egoist and a racist.
He took that decision just to tell Pakistanis that he is still there.
Darrel Hair is now ashamed of what he has done, and actually
its Hair who have brought the game to a disrepute, and Inzamam is just being used as a sheet to cover what Darrel Hair has done.
His letter to the ICC personnel about his retirement is actually a 'moral victory' for the Pakistanis. Hair is definitely aware of what he has done, and now to compensate this he is trying to play certain tricks, and ICC is backing him.
But my Lord knows who is right.
And Inshallah (means may the will of God be there) Pakistanis
will come out to be the innocent party.
And I think ICC should work as a body that governs cricket but
not as a 'money making' organisation.
2006-08-27 05:52:08 · answer #2 · answered by Ω Nookey™ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Darell hare always wanted to get fame, he did the ssame in 1996 against Sirilanka and then after getting so much fame he published a book named "The Decision", the bok got good bussiness and hare was rich now he is planning to do the same, he wants to get the fame and release another book and get alot of money. This decision is definetly a reason to get fame.
on the other side darell hare has always been against the Asians and thios is another example of this.
2006-08-27 23:59:41 · answer #3 · answered by Ayaz Ali 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A lot has been said about stupid Hair but I still consider it not enough keeping in view all he had done against the asian teams and those who are favouring him are just those stupid white people who had been beaten by Pakistan cricket team and does not digest the defeat.Regregan you need to peep in your own collar what Shane warne and Mark Waugh had done? only when they were in fear of losing their lives they reported it to the ACB and became "GENTLEMAN" what Shane is known for? Sex Maniac isn't he? Talk "Logic" my dear dont just **** about. There were 26 cameras and none of them capture any thing wrong because the wrong was done in Shitty Hair's Pocket how can you blame Pakistani team. Take a bath to clean garbage on yourself first.
2006-08-24 22:59:52 · answer #4 · answered by dua 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well i think the desicion was wrong there were atleast 25 cameras rolling also there were also about 3 umpires a match referee who didnot see it being done also what about the supoort staff nobody saw the pakistani layers tamper the ball with thier own eyes
2006-08-24 03:16:57 · answer #5 · answered by experience 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i think fairly undesirable for those adult adult males - i think they were lower than an excellent form of rigidity to finish in Australia and that may each from time to time deliver about losses and stupid blunders. It occurs to the Australian adult adult males too - and different communities. They change into fairly worrying and finally do not play to the better of their skill. Morale in the Pakistani crew is at it really is lowest ebb and the Cricket Board in Pakistan fairly has alot to respond to for that on my own - punishing them with existence bans and extremely overt and public complaint isn't any thanks to handle a morale problem in the crew. i imagine Afridi's comments are out of line - I mean, a number of those adult adult males are married and what message is that sending to their different halves and households. because it stands women persons from the area conflict through from an inferiority complicated (and wrongly so). at the same time as they couldn't imagine of something - blame the girls persons. it would want to seem women persons were created for the downfall of adult adult males. even with the undeniable fact that, in saying all that over the years there has continuously been the accusatory "finger" being pointed at Pakistan for countless "dishonest" and tournament fixing offences and a number of them have easily paid the fee with bans and suspensions and fines and so on.over the years .... Afridi himself isn't any angel with biting the ball in Australia. Afridi needs to mature rather so he can fit into the function of captain. It basically isn't cricket!!
2016-11-27 02:19:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is nothing wrong done by Mr.Hair.Inzy had chosen a childish way to protest instead he was having 100% chance of winning the Game and that would have a Hit at right place.
2006-08-24 02:44:21 · answer #7 · answered by shri 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
inzamum done a big mistake by not coming to play after the tea by this both umpires hesitated and by shape and condition of ball
mrs darell hair dared to give up match for england this mistake of inzamum
2006-08-24 03:30:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sab ek hi thele ke chatte battee hai.
2006-08-24 03:56:43 · answer #9 · answered by my jaaneman!!! 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What they did was absolutely correct. They followed the ICC rules.If you are doing wrong things then be ready for punishments.......Its natures law.
2006-08-24 21:11:48 · answer #10 · answered by praveen s 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
DAryl Hair is a stupid umpire.
2006-08-24 03:21:07 · answer #11 · answered by nuwanusa 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋