2006-08-24 02:07:50 · 11 answers · asked by Fabio 3 in Sports ➔ Baseball
Thanks for the info!
2006-08-24 05:04:05 · update #1
I think he will be an effective running back this year and should earn you some decent points in fantasy. Although he certainly will not lead the league.
2006-08-24 02:10:37 · answer #1 · answered by barter256 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Reggie bush would be a poor choice for a fantasy running back.
At most he will be spliting time with deuce in the backfield. There are many backs in the NFL who get the majority of the playing time and will do much better fantasy wise than Bush. If this is a keeper league you may wish to have him for the future since it seems he will be dominate a few years down the road. But if not, stick with backs that have consistent years and who start all season or the majority. This will ensure good scoring.
2006-08-24 02:15:19 · answer #2 · answered by green_wave49 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wow, you must have had to been high when you drafted. Of course this will be hard to answer considering I don't know the rest of your team. Reggie Bush will be splitting carries as he is dealing with Deuce McAllister who is a very decent back who has proved himself before. I mean, you really had to hvae traded poorly or drafted poorly to end up with him as your #1. The first 3-4 rounds are especially for RBs. They get the most points. Sorry bud, but you are going nowhere with him #1
2006-08-24 09:03:42 · answer #3 · answered by c-money 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would not depend on Reggie for big things right away. He is, after all, a rookie and the NFL is an entirely different level. That and he will be splitting carries with Deuce McAllister.
The Saints will also get more of their offense thru the air this year with Drew Brees at the controls.
2006-08-24 10:33:05 · answer #4 · answered by frenchy62 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
this isn't an uncomplicated one for some causes. you comprehend Reggie Bush is the middle of the Saints' offense, he receives the consists of and the receptions. Bush is the right operating decrease back in receptions, and is fourth in the NFL in receptions. in the journey that your league rewards for receptions, I say Bush. If no longer, I say Barber. The Jets have an awful run protection. even even with the undeniable fact that Barber stocks the ball, compared to Bush, he remains the Cowboys purpose line decrease back and their finisher on the right of the game. also my major situation with Bush is he's no longer certain the yards, and it sort of sounds like he getting wiped out. you do not ought to agonize about that with Barber. So I say Barber.
2016-11-27 02:17:02 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fabio I would pick an accomplished RB as my #1 back and possibly another big name as my #2. He may be a good #3 RB pick as long as he's around in the 3 - 4th rounds. LT, LJ or Shaun should be a good #1 pick.
2006-08-24 04:39:59 · answer #6 · answered by Oz 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
solid number 2 back, as ur number one not so much. it seems like he'll split time with Deuce McCalister in the backfield, i would go for Ladanian Tomlinson, Larry Johnson, Tiki Barber, players like those for ur top RB.
2006-08-24 06:16:48 · answer #7 · answered by Matt P 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
watching the preseason i wouldn't trust reggie bush. go find someone good.
2006-08-24 05:04:43 · answer #8 · answered by Spearfish 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is a BASEBALL forum - a real sport. Take you pansy a** football somewhere else.
2006-08-24 02:13:33 · answer #9 · answered by fireman4u 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Who gives a flying f...? As you readily admit, wrong category.
2006-08-24 02:25:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋