draft pick trade?

Question

I have the third overall pick in my ten team draft, I have an offer to trade #3 and # 23 for 8 and 13, giving me a first and two second rounders (8,13,18) sounds good numerically but if you put names to it I am not so sure. what do you think?

Answer 1

at #3 you are guaranteed one of: LJ, SA, or LT - that's why the other guy is willing to basically give up his second rounder.

In a 10-team league, if you stay put, you can expect something like this:

#3 - Tomlinson
#18 - Fitzgerald or Moss
#23 - Westbrook

With the trade:

#8 - Rudi Johnson
#13 - Mcgahee
#18 - Fitzgerald or Moss

Clearly, I'd rather have the first scenario than the 2nd. LT is just so much more dominant. Basically, you're trading Westbrook for Mcgahee (a gain yes, but not that big), but give up LT for Rudi (a big drop off).

Don't do it.

Answer 2

I disagree. once you're perfect that they are more desirable than one participant away, they do no longer have "no skills". Oakland has an marvelous protection (esp. passing protection) and may want to be a great deal benefited from an offensive-line and a quarterback. The huge receivers, at the same time as horribly behaved, are extremely proficient. If the Raiders can draft Russell volume a million and get an offensive lineman in the 2d round, they'll be much better. they gained't win more desirable than 5 video games, yet repeat the approach next 3 hundred and sixty 5 days, and they could be sturdy (even with the very undeniable actuality that no longer playoff contenders because they play in a killer branch). The Lions are a diverse case. the single position they're stacked at is vast receiver (albeit proficient gamers who always underachieve, likely as a results of back lack of an offensive line and quarterback). they gained't want Calvin Johnson because of this, and they could likely nevertheless get Joe Thomas at #4 or #5. i might want to commerce the #2 p.c.. to someone like Tampa Bay with an exceedingly weak offense and an growing old superstar WR (Galloway) and get their 2d round p.c.. besides, the position they could get Thomas in round a million and yet another offensive lineman besides as a QB in round 2 (John Beck or Kevin Kolb come to concepts).

Answer 3

It all depends on what you want for your team. If you keep your pick than you will have one of the BIG 3 and they can change games on their own. I do however like having 3 picks in the first 2 rounds. You can get 2 Tier2 backs and a great WR. I like it, but I would try to get an extra pick in the later rounds, maybe have him add a 6th rounder to the equasion, or maybe have him get your 38th pick vice your 23rd.

Answer 4

I'm assuming it's something like this: L. Tomlinson and J. Galloway for S. Jackson and L. Fitzgerald. That's pretty even on paper, but having a better RB is more important than having a better WR. So I wouldn't make that trade.

Answer 5

I personally wouldn't do it since you would probably get LADAINAIN TOMLINSON if you held on to the number three pick, and I personally don't think you give up a player of that caliber. You just don't.

Answer 6

noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo