Was it coincidence that Sitchin wrote about the Sumerian 12th planet on a massive elliptical orbit of our Sun?

Question

One of his claims is that the Sumerians knew and documented this planet. There are indeed depictions of what COULD be seen as 12 planets orbiting the sun accompanying their pictures of the beings known as the Anunnaki. These pictures allegedly date back in excess of 6000 years.

There is also controvertial ideas that this "12th" planet was the cause of cataclysmic occurances on Earth that almost wiped out life on this planet as it passed 'close' to us; the same major events that are documented in many of our different religious writings, perhaps?

The constructions of Stonehenge and many of the similar major prehistoric buildings world-wide that have so far been thought to have been for the purpose of monitoring the skys, were all started around the 3rd millennium, BCE, soon after the period in time that such cataclysms were thought to have occurred.
Another coincidence?

Can anyone tell me where this "12th" planet will be in it's orbit, around the year 2012?

Answer 1

I assume you are talking about the newly discovered object, 2003 UB313. It is currently in the constellation of Cetus, at R.A. 1h 37.7m, dec. -5° 34´. Since its orbital period is 557 years, it will have moved less than 4 degrees by 2012.

However, even as I write this, the IAU is voting, and it seems they will go with the option that demotes Pluto to asteroid so that the number of planets will drop to 8, instead of the option that gives us 12 planets. But it is all just definitions. There are hundreds of things that we COULD call planets if we wanted to.

Answer 2

Good observsation about 2012. That's the date of the end of the world according to the ancient Mayan calender. There seems to be a good correlation between the new planet and Sitchin's 'Nibiru'. However, Nibiru is supposed to have an orbit of 3500 years. I don't think the new planet has an orbit that large. Obviously his calculations were off. Maybe the orbit is some divisor or multiplier of 3500 years. Maybe 70 years. 70x50. ????? I'm sure you could find some prediction of where the new planet is in 2012. BTW, I refuse to call the new planet Xena. She is a fictional character having no mythological existence whatsoever. Stupid *****. Oh well. Good luck with that one.

Answer 3

Of all the stars interior the universe, some have planets (all of us understand of countless others as nicely our solar). a number of those planets are going to fall interior the type the place water is liquid. a number of those planets could have adequate iron of their cores to form an electromagnetic field. a number of those planets will strengthen existence. a number of that existence will strengthen intelligence. all of us understand all that's available because of the fact it did take place a minimum of as quickly as, and ought to ok take place someplace else too. however the planet develop into no longer "made" for us. We adapted to in super condition the planet and its changing environment. something that did no longer adapt ... is ineffective.

Answer 4

??