If someone asks to put a microchip inside your body for many purposes, what would be your response to it because now days development is needed for the coming generation to make life secured and friendly.
2006-08-23 19:55:54 · 13 answers · asked by jass1610 1 in Social Science ➔ Sociology
I will tell them no. Not only would that be an invasion of my privacy, but an assault on my body.
2006-08-23 20:01:44 · answer #1 · answered by The Apple Chick 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lets start with the fact that the technology to do this has been around for a a few years now. Chips have been implanted into pure breed dogs and cats for years now, I kno I got my dog 4 years ago and by then the pradtice was so common that the price of the chip was already included in your purchase. If you're wondering why we're putting microchips into our four legged friends, it's mainly for identification purposes. If your pet is lost and taken to the vet a simple check by the vet will identify the owner of the animal and if you've reported the animal missing, the fact that it's missing. However to apply this technology to humans is another matter entirely. With pets its just a number that pops up a file in a national database with owner information, with humans it's bound to go farther. It would not surprise me that the use of such technology in humans would include scanning say your wrist at a grocery store to pay for your purchases. Likewise your entire file would be attatched to that one chip, it's not secure to have so much information walking around, so to speak. Some of the earlier posters were correct in stating that such a phenomenon is mentioned in the book of Revelations. Okay so it doesn't say a microchip, but modern scholars have been led to believe that this is in fact the case, that or a tattoo, similar to those used by the nazi's to identify victems in their concentration camps during the Holocaust. While my dog has not suffered any side effects from the chip at the back of her neck, a bump can be felt where the chip is, im not so sure I'd like a rice sized bump on my arm in any case. I'd have to say that I would refuse to have a chip implanted for any reason whatsoever.
2006-08-27 14:45:03 · answer #2 · answered by Vanessa E 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That makes total sense, but people will object to that. There is a prediction in the Bible that everyone will be force to have a mark on thier hand or forehead. The mark with be thier own number, and the number of a man which is called the Beast in the Bible.
See the below link. This is serious business, because what you are saying is probably going to happen, and the people are going to be forced to accept this microchip. Don't you think it makes sense that governements will eventually think we have to do this?
2006-08-23 20:02:34 · answer #3 · answered by The Bible (gives Hope) 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
massive BROTHER. ignore it. My dad has talked approximately this because 1999, while he have been given into the full John Birch Society element. I hate their possible baseless propoganda, yet there is not any way i visit enable that decrease than my epidermis. that's the mark of our lazy, silly complacency. undesirable sufficient that EZ bypass catches human beings cheating- I recommend, large, yet what an invasion of privateness!! yet to have the government able to monitoring all and sundry's each and every flow??? No thank you.
2016-12-17 16:14:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
first implant it on every politician and politically affiliated person and their family. Then implant it on all police/military personell and their family. Let's see how that works for a year. If it works fine, then use it on the masses.. They (politicians, armed forces) can be the guinea pigs of their own laws. If it works for them (especially politicians - most being corrupt) then I'd be willing.
2006-08-23 20:05:28 · answer #5 · answered by wildhair 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not a snow balls chance in hell. I would carry a card with the info but there is no way it is going to be implanted in my body...
2006-08-23 22:36:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Those who give up any inate liberty for any temporary security deserve niether fredoom nor security
2006-08-23 20:05:42 · answer #7 · answered by Jeremiah 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
id say no. this is a free country. that would just bring us closer to a 1984 world.
2006-08-25 05:51:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
read the bible revelation writes of something like this. they are going to try to get rid of money all together. do not accept anything like this. i am not crazy but i want you to save your soul.
2006-08-23 20:03:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Start with the people that are under house arrest. if that works ok then do it to all the teachers.
2006-08-27 00:46:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋