would you still say Einstein was smart...or would you say he was dumb?
2006-08-23 18:54:55 · 11 answers · asked by rekha c 3 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
So, all you are thinking about today is dumbness huh?? Well, Einstein was smart about his theories!! But dumb about falling in the pool........ But isnt alcohol supposed to hae that effect on anyone?? What was he trying to derive near the pool anyway? Hadnt he heard that you should not "Drink and Derive"??
2006-08-23 22:20:02 · answer #1 · answered by nice_libra_guy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Einstein was not only a genius, but a tremendous humanitarian. He is definitely a hero of mine. If he, just as anyone else happened to get drunk and fall into a pool and drown, I would not call that being dumb, rather, a very unfortunate accident. God forbid, if this happened to someone you love dearly, would you feel that they were dumb??
2006-08-24 04:27:54 · answer #2 · answered by sciteach9 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well if he had drank too much and fell in the pool and drowned after he had been known for his genius talent than he is smart. If he drank too much and fell in the pool and drowned before history happened than he is dumb.
2006-08-24 02:03:26 · answer #3 · answered by biochick11220 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
depends when this happened...
If this happened in 1900, then nobody would have cared and those that knew him would probably think he had some problems...
If this happened in 1950, then everyone would have cared and they'd still say he was smart.
2006-08-24 02:01:50 · answer #4 · answered by tbom_01 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You don't take away a Nobel Prize for that. And his Nobel wasn't even for what he was made famous for!
No, he would be celebrated all that much more...Germans are allowed such privileges.
2006-08-24 02:02:58 · answer #5 · answered by powhound 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was a smart fellow for that he invented and not for the activities that he did on a day to day basis.....
2006-08-24 04:05:34 · answer #6 · answered by doable_rods 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually, I don't think they had swimming pools in 1900.
2006-08-24 03:43:16 · answer #7 · answered by MrZ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well depends...
wuz it before he started discovering stuff that made him well known, or was it before he did anything great?
if it was before, i wouldn no about him, and if i did then i wouldnt think to highly of him
if it was after, id still think he was smart, and id feel bad for him
2006-08-24 02:01:53 · answer #8 · answered by payal 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Before or after he published his theories?
2006-08-24 02:00:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd say we wouldn't be talking about him right now!
2006-08-24 02:00:07 · answer #10 · answered by amd730 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋