Is there any proof we came from bacteria?

Question

Evolution teaches we all came from bacteria millions of years ago. Is there any proof of this? Is there proof we all came from bacteria?

Answer 1

No, what the science books say is that during the creation of the Earth, there is single-celled organisms initially from the moment of creation. This is true, In the belief that God created man, he made the earth first and put men there. The Earth itself is a living object, so its not hard to believe that there is life before Adam and eve, just not conscious life. No evidence linking man to singled cell organism, just like no link to ape, just really close and a theory.

Answer 2

It's a complicated question. There is now proof that evolution works (I just devised such a proof last night, in response to another YA questioner). But that proof does not address the specifics of the evolutionary path, which still needs evidence to fully demonstrate. To see the current state of the evidence, see the reference.

Answer 3

Sure, chemical fossils my dear Watson. Initially there was only chemical reproduction and later biological reproduction.
Two caveats rule: The requirement for no oxygen and no competition. Then the first bacteria appeared starting fotosynthesis and producing oxygen and the world changed.

Answer 4

No empirical evidence has been discovered whatsoever. Evolutionary theory is grossly lacking in any substantial evidence. The so called "proofs" have time and time again been shown to be inaccurate or a hoax. This is the evolutionary formula for a universe: Nohing + nothing= 2 elements + time = 92 natural elements + time = all physical laws, completely structure universe of galaxies, systems, stars, planets etc. This is the evolutionary formula for life : Dirt + water + time = living creatures. The lack of evidence includes the fact that there have been no halfway species ever found. All plant and animal species are in definate categories seperate from one another. No halfway speicies are found in the fossil strata including the fossils of extinct animals and plants.....with over 100 million fossils in museums and collections today one would think that a fossil showing a crossover would be found....like ape to man...but none have, and all those claimed have been discovered to be false. The basic laws of physics eliminate the basic evolutionary theory as well....1st and 2nd law of thermodynamics for example. How about the fact that nothing can not produce something which is the basic formula for the beginning of evolution...the list is too long and there are so many books out there, even by evolutionary scientists who have admitted to no proof at all.

Answer 5

no according to me there is no proof coz was any scientist that time don't you agree

Answer 6

Ironically evolution tells us absolutely nothing for certain. It simply postulates that there is a time related process of change in the earth's biospehere modulated by the biosphere's internal environment. So to answer your question, evolution alone cannot draw a linear line between bacteria and humans but rather it can suggest a mechanism for this to have happened. This mechanism is a very difficult thing to test since the process by which it takes place is so slow ( over many millions of years usually) and human experiments usually last only a few years at most.

There is evidence to suggest that a slow adaptive process in nature working over say 4.3 billion years can lead from unicellular organisms to highly adaptive organisms such as our own. To test such a theory would require experments that last millions of years. These are not practical.

If you want to explore further the origins of life on earth I suggest reading about the Miller-Urey experiment:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller-Urey_experiment

Seek and you shall find !

Answer 7

There is good fossil evidence

Answer 8

Sure. We can literally see the fossil evidence (yes, there is fossil bacteria) of the bacteria becoming more and more complex up through the strata of rock until it forms the animal and plant forms we recognize today.

Answer 9

Lol....there is not one shred of scientific evidence that supports evolution in any manner, shape or form. Quite the contrary, evidence that should be there if evolution was true, is missing. This is strong proof against evolution.

Further, the part of evolution you are referring to, that life began in the primordial ooze, violates a root tenant of biology, the principle of biogenesis......the understanding that life can only come from other life and never from non-life. Seriously, life never, never, NEVER comes from non-living matter. For the primordial ooze hypothesis to be anything more than a joke, life would have to occassionally come from non-life.....occassionally, organic chemicals would have to combine to form even the most primitive living organism. This NEVER happens.....making the primordial ooze theory so much bullshi t. As the entire hypothesis of evolution is bullsh it.

Or put another way....where's the proof? Surely in the hundred plus years this has been bandied around the scientific community, the tiniest bit of evidence supporting evolution could have been found.

It has not.