did in Europe in WW2?
It seems like the government is similarly radical. It also seems as if Iran has a history of trying and/or succeeding.
I'm afraid that middle eastern countries are so sure that the west is so skewed against them that they ignore the west's warnings. Instead believing that Iran is will be their protector in the region, but not realizing how right they are.
I also feel like many times they don't seem to see how the world wars help us understand the reality of the worst of human nature.
Even with a weaker military than the US or EU, I think the nuclear deterent would hold significant sway against would be adversaries (not wanting to touch off a nuclear holocaust). That is, we will be far less able to protect innocent Sunnis, Kurds, Christians, Jew, and other non-Shia muslims from a little ethnic cleansing.
2006-08-23
17:48:21
·
6 answers
·
asked by
BigPappa
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Government
ANGELS_RAISING_HELL:
You see the Iranians will believe that they are liberating the holy land of the scourge of the unbelievers, thus liberating the those that are properly faithful (Shi'a).
2006-08-23
17:56:21 ·
update #1
LOL, the first hardcore evidence of WW2? Holy crap they took Poland!
2006-08-23
18:06:15 ·
update #2
dzeyoyo123:
I don't really know what he studies. You haven't really answered the question though, you have simply avoided the connection. You connect Germany to the US government, however, but you fail to see the US is based on two Iranian fronts. I'm not sure that the US is ethnically cleansing Iraq and Afghanistan though...
2006-08-23
18:29:25 ·
update #3
It should be read as "non-(Shi'a muslims)."
2006-08-23
18:33:51 ·
update #4