Would it upset you if your bf/gf had more sexual partners than you?

Question

I think what's in the past should stay in the past. Just curious what others think about it.

Answer 1

To some degree, but you can't change the past. If you're bf/gf has enough trust in you to tell you things about his/her past w/ out worrying then you shouldn't be worried or bothered. What matters is that he/she's faithful to you know.

Answer 2

As far as i am concerned his past does matter in some situations if he has had too many quick relationships i would be careful he might be a hit it and quit it kinda guy on the other hand it could mean that he has a lot of experience and that's always a plus.

Answer 3

I think if one partner has had a whole lot of partners and the other hasn't had very many at all then yes, there might be some tension in that aspect.

Answer 4

No. i do not view relationships previous to marriage as something unique. after I had a boyfriend- i.e. at the same time as i became basically relationship- I felt loose to make certain whomever i wanted and felt that my boyfriend had an same precise. I seen bf/gf relationships because the era in which i might want to make certain if issues might want to get as severe as marriage. at the same time as my husband and that i have been basically bf/gf, I went on a date or 2 and so did he. We did not sense accountable because of how we view relationships, and we both are in contract as to the tone of the relationship previous to marriage. obviously, the bf/gf in this project do not view relationships as we did. What i do not get is, who in the hell kisses and cuddles and spend the nighttime, yet don't have sex? what's the rationalization behind spending the nighttime once you may sleep on your own mattress? Even throughout our bf/gf section, i did not sleep with different dudes and that i noticeably did not stay over nighttime, I basically went out to a movie or dinner each once in a lengthy time period. yet.. outdoors of that. i'm having problem with ".. you realized it became incorrect" because this sounds like BS. How might want to you no longer comprehend that became incorrect, and what might want to deliver it on your interest that its incorrect?? That makes no experience. i wager my factor is, i could not positioned myself in this position because i'm no longer delusional. i comprehend that if the tone of my relationship isn't a particular way, particular issues are not allowed, and that i'd not comprehend i became incorrect after the very actuality. even with the undeniable fact that, enable's say that I actual did not comprehend it became incorrect and realized it after it exceeded off, i might want to admit the blunders at the moment because it became basically that- a mistake. provided that it wasn't, might want to I no longer say something and definite, that can make me sense accountable. Deception is inaccurate.

Answer 5

it's more of weather you love the person enough to look past everything is what i've been told. it will bug the other person though some how, because i know i would be.

Answer 6

Totally agree. 100%

Answer 7

You mean it's not durin the time you guys r dating right..? Then it's ok...past is the past

Answer 8

no. But i would rather not have to sit thru memory lane. An ex- boyfriend of mine used to tell me all the details with each and every one of the girls.... not cool

Answer 9

It shouldn't matter but men usually get self conscious about it. One of life's double standards.

Answer 10

Na. As long as mine has the biggest effect we're good.