What is the legal obligation to trim a tree back if the neighbor thinks that the roots may cause damage?

Question

We have a neighbor that thinks we should pay to have a tree trimmed back to prevent possible damage to thier pool. We offered to pay for 50% but they stated they would rather sue if damage occurs to thier pool

Answer 1

As far as I know, you are responsible for any part of the tree on your property. They are responsible for any part of the tree on their property, including overhanging limbs.
-
The upside of this is if a section of the tree is on their land, it's their responsibility. I would assume this would also apply for roots under the ground that cross over the boundary.
-
The downside of this is any part of the tree on their property they can eradicate, for better or worse. Which can make for some silly-looking trees and plants.

Answer 2

You have no obligation to trim anything so long as there is no injured party. If, however, damage does occur to their pool, they might sue, and in today's courts, you can't tell what the judge might say. For my part, I think that any part of the plant on their property is their responsibility. But I can't guarantee that the judge will see things my way.
It’s too bad that your neighbors aren’t neighborly.

Answer 3

trimming a tree back will not affect the roots. the only way to bet rid of the roots is to cut down the tree. contact you local Farm Bureau agent. if he or she doesnt know the answer , he could surely direct you to someone who does. this probably varies from state to state

Answer 4

If the tree is half on the property line then they can trim their own side.

Answer 5

Check with your local municipal authorities (City Hall or County Courthouse) as the laws/ordinances may vary from one place to another.