2006-08-23 14:43:49 · 5 answers · asked by novembergirl01 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Yes, in part. The prevention should begin with parents. The concern of the association is primarily neighborhood safety, that is, fire prevention. But it is the concern of the parents in case of child's chemical poisoning. As a mater of rule, children should not play with firecrackers, unless there is parental or adult supervision.
2006-08-23 14:47:44 · answer #1 · answered by Bummerang 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If this is a UK question, no, the Housing Officer in charge of the Council or Housing Association housing is responsible. Email the Senior Housing Officer and threaten to go to the press and local politicians for a quick fix.
2006-08-23 21:47:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
People are aware of Associations when they buy their houses. If they didn't want to live in a police state, they shouldn't have bought there.
2006-08-23 21:48:43 · answer #3 · answered by normobrian 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sort of. They should stop it if they see it, but the parents should be responsible for their children.
2006-08-23 21:45:29 · answer #4 · answered by trueblue88 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2006-08-23 21:44:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋