English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

yes! because i can think that

2006-08-23 14:05:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes if we had a draft but we do not. I wish WE did what Israel does.Every male/ female has to serve 2 years at age 18. No exceptions.They receive free collage for there service. They also are on call for 18 years.This info was given to me by a collage student who live near me.He has been here for 3 years and when he goes back he begins his 2 year hitch. He says he is not looking forward to the Army but says he wants to protect his country. I wish more young people in this country felt that way..

2006-08-23 21:26:46 · answer #2 · answered by BUTCH 5 · 0 0

Yes, they are no different than any other American and just because their father is the president doesn't mean they get special treatment, I think they should be PLACED in the Army and given no special treatment just because they are the "commander and chiefs" daughters.

2006-08-23 21:06:13 · answer #3 · answered by marajade_04 3 · 0 0

No Why? cause they are girls you dont ask girls to go fight in wars if the president had twin boys then yes

2006-08-30 03:59:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Every body is responsible for his duties. Bush has been selected as President of his country. He has to perform his duty as a President.

2006-08-23 21:29:50 · answer #5 · answered by snashraf 5 · 0 0

We getting our azzes handed to us on a silver platter. I don't think the Bush twins would be of much of a help here. Maybe "servicing" US GI's, maybe...

2006-08-23 21:10:47 · answer #6 · answered by Sean T 5 · 0 1

Ya damn skippy they should.

For all the same reasons they pulled people out of retirement and extended outgoing soldiers terms.


I'd call all the above reasons a draft.

2006-08-23 21:08:38 · answer #7 · answered by Steve 4 · 0 0

Why shouldn't they? When the families of the rich and powerful fail to answer the nation's call, someone not so fortunate goes in their place.

2006-08-29 23:20:43 · answer #8 · answered by davidepeden 5 · 0 0

No. Women should not be placed on battle lines. Pilots, whatever other thing they can do is great, but you don't want women on the battle line.

2006-08-23 21:11:52 · answer #9 · answered by DB Cash 4 · 0 0

Given their fathers record, I have to say no. We are in enough trouble as it is.

2006-08-23 22:51:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers