Of course it is not impossible.
Make a rectangle with side of 0.63 and 14.37.
This will give an area of 9.053
2006-08-23 12:45:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Stewart H 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If it is a rectangle:
P = 2*(l + w) = 30
l+w = 15
l = 15-w
A = l * w = 9
(15-w)*w = 9
15w - w^2 = 9
w^2 -15w +9 = 0
by quadratic formula
w = 15/2 +/- sqrt(225-36)
w = 7.5 +/- sqrt(189)
w ~= 21.25
However: if w ~= 21.25 and l = 15-w, then l < 0.
Therefore, this figure cannot be constructed as a rectangle. It may be possible to construct a figure with perimeter 30 and area 9 as some other polygon, but i don't think it would be...
2006-08-23 20:17:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by bpc299 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No
Rectangle possibility
Side 1 .62
Side 2 14.38
These are estimates from a quadratic
2*.62 + 2 * 14.38 = 30 Perimeter
.62 * 14.38 = 9 AREA
2006-08-23 19:36:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Nojunk N 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
This would give the equations as follows where x is the height and y is the width.
2x + 2y = 30
xy = 9
I believe that their is a solution to these. The perimeter of a rectangle can be make arbitrarily large with the same area by making the rectangle as long and skinny as you need it to be.
2006-08-23 19:25:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by rscanner 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, this is possible.
For a rectangle,
Perimeter= 2*(length + width)=30
Area=length*width=9
2(l+w)=30 => l+w=15
l=15-w
(15-w)*w=9
15*w-w^2=9
w^2-15w+9=0
w=(15 +/- sqrt(225-4*9))/2
w=(15+sqrt(189))/2 ~= 14.3738635
l=(15-sqrt(189))/2 ~= 0.626136458
Check: 2*(0.626136458+14.3738635) = 30
0.626136458*14.3738635= 9
2006-08-23 19:25:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by maegical 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
ya it is impossible cuz the perimeter cannot be 30 and the area be 9 come on its comomn sense
2006-08-23 19:25:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Serenity C 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
no
let assume the figure is a rectan. with lengh l and width w
perimeter = (l + w)*2=30 and area = w*l = 9
i think u are able to find l and w and there is a solution.
2006-08-23 19:25:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by ___ 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is possible because 30 and 9 could be anything, they haven't been defined.
2006-08-23 19:24:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes
A rectangle of 14.3735 x 0.6261
2006-08-23 19:40:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by QuietFire 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes
2006-08-23 19:25:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by K 3
·
0⤊
0⤋