Here's my RBs and WRs:
Alexander
Westbrook
Jones, Greg
Johnson, Andre
Chambers
Mason
Bennett
Jurevicius
Smith, Rod
2006-08-23 11:55:27 · 17 answers · asked by cowboysfan078 2 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
Gore's stock has risen since the Barlow trade...I would say it's about even value now for Chambers. If you feel you need more depth at RB, then go for it. I really couldn't say if it's a benefit for you not knowing how many WR's start on your team or RB's for that matter. Usually people like to have the depth at RB though...good luck!
2006-08-23 12:27:49 · answer #1 · answered by heat_mizor 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I still don't see Gore being worth more than Chambers. I'm a 49ers fan and even though we traded away Barlow, we got V. Davis and A. Bryant now, that means A. Smith will throw a lot too while Gore at the very best will get 1000 rushing YDs and 6 TDs while Chambers will consistently be thrown to from Culpepper and will get about 1300 receiving YDs and 10 TDs, which will make him a top 7 WR in all of NFL and FF while Gore might be good, but not better than Chambers, even thouhg i really hope he'll do well.
2006-08-23 16:12:34 · answer #2 · answered by The Fantasy King 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i do not comprehend what Gore's problem is (why he hasn't come everywhere on the breaking point of very last 3 hundred and sixty 5 days's production). yet, if I owned him, my staying power might want to be fairly skinny about now. Portis is an improve, yet no longer through a lot. even with the undeniable fact that, Chambers is going to be the major WR in San Diego initiating week 8 (Chargers on a bye week 7). no matter if he receives stunning numbers in that position or basically clears out the protection (decoy) remains to be determined. carry close onto Gore. a minimum of for a lengthy time period. you may play Henry and Peterson. And, Selvin youthful is going to take over in Denver every time Henry begins serving his suspension. If Gore then comes round, each and each of the more desirable helpful. yet, when you're making the commerce, and Chambers would not produce and Gore finally breaks out, you may be kicking your self all a thanks to the loser's bracket.
2016-11-27 01:23:56 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
now that Barlow is no longer a 49er I would say yes before the Barlow trade would say no. Gore will be an every down rb now
2006-08-23 12:13:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, Chambers has been a stud with bad qb's. When Culpepper is healthy, Chambers value will go up. Besides Gore is unproven, while Chambers has already shown his talent.
2006-08-23 17:59:52 · answer #5 · answered by Tucker C 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO! Gore has the worst offensive line in the NFL blocking for him. Why would you even consider giving up your top WR for a RB who isn't even better than your top 2?
2006-08-23 18:25:17 · answer #6 · answered by JUICE_0032 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO!!!!!!!!!!!! Keep Chambers. He is the best WR on your squad. You have a stud in Alexander and a yardage hog in Westbrook. Gore will have a good season but its not worth giving up Chambers.
2006-08-23 14:48:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
definitely. especially with the 49ers trading away kevin barlow. frank gore has now become a premiere running back who is as likely to run or catch a ball. btw... the rest of your players are great.
2006-08-23 12:17:05 · answer #8 · answered by bmn44 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would not do that trade you have good depth at rb, and Chambers is gonna blow up this year, and your only consistent wr!
2006-08-24 01:41:47 · answer #9 · answered by tony l 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would keep Chambes , I feel he will have another great season , while Gore is an unknown ( a toss up ) , go for the sure numbers
2006-08-23 11:58:54 · answer #10 · answered by okole 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋