Does Juventus deserve a harsher and more severe punishment ?

Question

Or did they get away with very little punishment?

Answer 1

i think "juve" got away with very little punishment. If thats what you are alluding to! hahahahahaha. Ps : I_like_your_sense_of_humor!

Answer 2

1. No, they deserve a more little punishment.
2. No, they had a harsher and more severe punishment than other Clubs had.

Could it be you are misunderstanding?

Juventus:
i) admitted they're guilty
ii) banned THE WHOLE OLD MANAGEMENT
iii) said 'serie B relegation could be a balanced judgement and we need to accept it'
The other Clubs involved - Milan, Fiorentina, Lazio:
i) declared they were innocent (LIARS)
ii) declared if they were fined, they immediately switch to Law Courts.
Sport Court judges
i) switched Milan first judgment to a lighter one, allowing them to play Champions League preliminaries
ii) canceled Fiorentina and Lazio 'serie B' relegation
iii) Juventus had only switched from 30- to -17 points in 'serie B'.
They had an hard judgment against the most collaborative team and a fair judgment with menacing Clubs, and, besides law codes and microcodes and lawyers masterworks, this is an ancient and stinky Italian behavior who must be blamed.
'Forte con i deboli e debole con i forti'
'To be harsh with the weaker and soft with the stronger'
Cowardice.
Doing this they were willing to avoid other judgment session, which obviously will stop the championship starting. There was a last judgment, they refused Juventus claims and now they got what they deserve.
Blame on them.
Now, Juventus will be more fined (if Italian Football Federation wouldn't do this FIFA will sanction them and Italian Clubs in UEFA cups), and championship won't start.
Morons, all they are morons.

Now it will be pure CHAOS and - as always - supporters are the more disappointed.

Answer 3

There are 2 ways to look at this question. If you look at Juventus' punishment without looking into anything else, i think their relegation for the match-fixing scandal is deserved and justified. It is certainly not more nor is it less than what they deserved.

But if you compare their punishments in comparison to thos received by Fiorentina, Lazio and AC Milan, it appears as if Juventus have been unfairly singled out in this controversy.
The punishments given to Fiorentina and Lazio were initially right, as they deserved relegation, and Milan deserved to be kicked out of th UCL and get a 15 pt deduction. But after the appeals, Milan have been let back into UCL and have only a 7pt deduction, while Lazio and Fiorentina have been promoted as well. From which angle does this seem fair to Juventus??????

Although i am appaled by the weak punishments given to milan,fiorentina and lazio, i still think Juve got the deserved punishment, which hopefull will be enough to prevent another such scandal from erupting in the future.

Answer 4

Frankly, I think they are being victimised. If 4 clubs were being investigated, how come in the 1st sentencing, AC Milan was allowed to remain in the Serie A. That showed double standard. Look at Fiorentina and Lazio who both finished lower that Juve and AC getting a similar punishment to Juve.
And I think its b/c the former Italian PM, Berlusconi owns AC, thats why they got off lightly. Look at their GM, Galiani (or whatever his name is), he got ONLY A 6 MONTH suspension. THAT IS ABSOLUTELY ABSURD!!!! That means he can still retutn during this current campaign. Thats not fair.

If indeed the other clubs (Lazio and Fio) were invloved, whats the measure of benefit they recieved, since none of them beat Inter to 3rd spot. So obviously they didnt benefit that much, then why punish them more than someone that probably gained more from the fixed matches (AC). Its just not fair.

If AC, Lazio and Fio are still in Serie A, Juve is justified (not deserved) to be there as well with a point penalty. IT IS NOT FAIR. This is DOUBLE STANDARDS at play!!!

Answer 5

No, to be retrogated in serie B is already a harsh punishment. They didn't deserve to be punish. Yeah they were only victimes. How dare you ask such a question as if it's still not enough for all of you. Juve is suffering enough, there's no need to punish them again.

Answer 6

They the two need to be faraway from society. in the event that they're nonetheless able to doing injury even from penal complex, they need to die; each organism, no be counted if a guy or woman or a society, has the suited to shield itself against terrorists AND psychopaths - if, certainly, there's a distinction between the two. i do no longer evaluate such defenses by ability of a society to be "punishment;" I evaluate them to be effects which could logically stick to the strikes in question. If their strikes have been intentional, as interior the case of a terrorist, then in line with probability that result's justice. If the strikes are the fabricated from an irrational suggestions, as interior the case of a psychopath, the result's an unlucky necessity, yet a necessity besides the shown fact that, in my opinion.

Answer 7

No, they were punished tooooooooo severely; just look at the the other teams mainly AC Milan.

Answer 8

I don't think so.
I think Juventus has had enough.
I think now the same rule should be applied to the rest of the italian teams that used the same "methods". Period.

Goodluck!

Answer 9

i think that they deserve a severe punishment

Answer 10

noo.. i think it was really unfair to punish the players in the first place when they did nothing wrong..