2006-08-23 08:16:38 · 14 answers · asked by A Baby Ate My Dingo 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
There would be no one left to work. You welfare Democrats would starve.
2006-08-23 08:20:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
1. The US would cancel its occupation of Iraq and try to help the country recover. (Yes. It WILL be a big mess when the US leaves. But it will be a big mess WHENEVER the US leaves.) Then, when the Islamist government establishes control after Iraq's civil war, the US would talk to its leaders and establish an open dialogue with them.
2. The US would impeach Bush & Cheney posthumously.
3. The US would start listening to the concerns of the other countries. (Bush doesn't care what other countries think.)
4. The US would start to repair its honor and international reputation, and the frst step would be to apologize for the actions of the Bush Administration and the CIA over the last 30-40 years.
5. The US would take 100 years to repair all the damage caused by the Bush Administration and its corporate cronies.
2006-08-23 08:29:20 · answer #2 · answered by zelduh 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Don't kid yourself. The politicians love it when they get you polarized like this, a trick with they all use, but especially the Democrats. They get you to buy into the idea that there is a big difference between Democrats and Republicans, but take away all the rhetoric and they all want the same thing, to control you and take your money. If they can get you hating Republicans, then the Democrats have succeeded in getting you to buy into the process by which they screw you. Take a close look. The Dems have got you thinking that Republicans are rich, greedy tools of the corporations. But overall, the Democrat politicians are a wealthier bunch who get more from corporate donors.
As long as they keep us focused on Republicans vs. Democrats, both parties win and the people lose. Wouldn't it be nice if we had a real choice? Isn't it time for there to be more than two parties which mirror each other while pretending to be adversaries?
The very nature of this question demonstrates how powerful their tools of manipulation can be. Democrats portray themselves as peace-loving folks, but the anti-Republican rhetoric is quite often peppered with this kind of viciousness. Can you imagine the same words being spoken about people based on their ethnicity, or life choices they have made?
They will all take your money and restrict your freedoms at every opportunity. Don't let them fool you into thinking that they are your friends and the "other" party are the enemy. If you want to decide how to spend your money for yourself and to be allowed to engage in whatever peaceful, non-fraudulent activity you choose, you're not going to find that as long as you keep getting duped into a choice between Democrat and Republican.
2006-08-23 08:48:40 · answer #3 · answered by Libertarians 4 real choice 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
there is not any longer 2 cents nicely worth of distinction between the Republicans and the Democrats. One responder stated tax and spend liberals. replaced into he speaking with reference to the Democrats or the Republicans? in case you all will keep in mind while Bush replaced into campaigning to invade Iraq, the Democrats have been at the back of him each and each of ways. we've the terrific government money could purchase be they Democrat or Republican.
2016-09-29 21:50:11 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who would do all of the work and pay all of the taxes to support your socialist programs? What would you whine about in your red rag newspapers or on National Proletariate Radio? I guess NPR's "All Things Misconstrued" would have to go off the air. Oh that's right, without taxes NPR would go off the air anyway. Oh my, and no more National Endowment support for masterpieces like "Piss Christ." The Michelangelos of our age will starve.
Get real, pal. Without us you guys wouldn't make it to the end of the week and its already Wednesday.
2006-08-23 09:28:35 · answer #5 · answered by anonymourati 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Don't know about that dead thing but all I know is we were better off 6 years ago than right now under the republican administration.
2006-08-23 08:20:41 · answer #6 · answered by tyrone b 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The all the special interest liberal groups would fight amongst each other to include Socialists for America, the one's who start bad rumours and 'peace' rallies (of which learned subterfuge in Cuba... you probably don't even believe it because the administration MUST be wrong and everyone else right), there would be more pollution because more corporations would be allowed to go south so they don't have to pay for dumping and polluting violations and take more American jobs with them... thanks to Clinton. Yes, I would be in a better place... out of this world!
Who would create jobs? Oh that's right, everyone would be on welfare... who needs jobs?
2006-08-23 08:21:47 · answer #7 · answered by madbaldscotsman 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Who's going to do my tax return? Oh, never mind we just send it all to Washington. Thank heavens I'm a registered independent.
2006-08-23 08:35:31 · answer #8 · answered by Woody 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's not very nice to say. But hypothetically, the world would be much more peaceful and productive. Lazy republicans!
2006-08-23 08:24:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
A lot dude, undoubtedly much better!
2006-08-23 10:18:58 · answer #10 · answered by me 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not good. We'd go from a "tax and spend" government to a "spend and tax" government.
Next question?
2006-08-23 08:22:41 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋