I have a feeling they just might. Being how the US is the only reason it is even there now.
2006-08-23 08:10:27 · 12 answers · asked by WhiteHat 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
What nonesense!
Iran and Syria should pay for rebuilding Lebanon, and for the destruction in Israel.
If you don't know or are simply bigoted, let me remind you how the current conflict began:
BUT FOR Hezbullah, supported by Syria and Iran, going on Israeli soil, killing 8 and kidnapping 2 soldiers, Israel would not have been on the offensive to destroy Hezbullah.
Syria and Iran have long controlled Lebanon, causing massive devastation and weakening the society over there, especially the Christian minority.
Israel existed thousands of years before Muhammed wore his diapers! The re-establishment of Israel in 1948 is in large part due to the help of the U.S., but certainly not the only. You are angling on one-sided bias against Israel, but you seem to fall short of it by a bit. Why are you holding back? I know you are itching to spew hate against Israel.
Israel ought to continue this fight and level Syria and Iran to the ground. Enough with Israel being on a leash. Israel must be able to destroy Islamofascism, starting with the head of Islamofascism, Iran. Iran must be dealt with before it is too late.
How dare you even pose this nonesense when you are clearly don't know or care how it all began and who is responsible for the current situation? Outrageous!
2006-08-23 08:16:58 · answer #1 · answered by EDDie 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No Israel backed down because they were getting their a s s e s kicked - especially by the anti-tank weapons that created much of the casualties. After the skirmish (ceasefire) they sent a delegation t o Moscow complaining about those anti-tank weapons being in the hands of Hezbollah.
I just cant believe this - they came to Lebanon with all knockout power to destroy and as you witnessed the death and destruction that they meted out relentlessly - they have the nerve to complain because the Hezbollah wouldnt just suit there and wait for themselves to be killed!
They made the choice to go there instead of negotiating.
Ole Quick draw Olmert
2006-08-23 18:30:10 · answer #2 · answered by worriedaboutyou 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. If the USA demanded it, Israel would do it. The USA gives Israel billions of dollars in military and economic aid. Israel would have a very difficult time without it. However, I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for the USA to do that.
2006-08-23 15:15:25 · answer #3 · answered by nasonic 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmm... Here's the thing. We give a lot of money to Israel, so even if the U.S. were to demand such a thing, it would look like Israel would be paying when in fact we would be rebuilding Lebanon.
2006-08-23 15:17:22 · answer #4 · answered by kitt 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We got more chance of North Korea responding to our "demands". Find more than 2 people in Congress that are going to make a demand on Israel.
2006-08-23 15:48:54 · answer #5 · answered by Woody 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Condoleeza Rice had a big influence over Olmert regarding the war. See www.debka.com
2006-08-23 15:16:24 · answer #6 · answered by Brand X 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think Israel should give one nickle to rebuild Lebanon, and for us to even suggest it is ludicrous. Beside I understand Iran is paying for it.
2006-08-23 15:13:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes. However, immediately thereafter Israel will apply for US aid to pay for the bill. And we will/are.
2006-08-23 15:18:07 · answer #8 · answered by urherebozo 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
stop drinking the cool aid
2006-08-23 15:14:29 · answer #9 · answered by W E J 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not this time, whenever they listen to the US S..t happens to them.
2006-08-23 15:14:39 · answer #10 · answered by Zen 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋