2006-08-23 07:52:49 · 20 answers · asked by REPUBS_R_traitorous_garbage 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I don't advocate blowing the building up, but shuttering it in the name of public mental health isn't a bad idea.
When liberal propaganda is disguised as "news" it is dangerous to the weak minded. The Democratic party is full of people who cannot discern reality from the Times' reporting.
2006-08-23 08:32:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually the reason why Ann Coulter desires the bombing of the New York Times isn’t because it is a slanted liberal media organization that constantly underscores facts that embarrass this administration and conservative ideology. No, you see that is just a ruse to cover the real embarrassing reason for why most conservatives, including Ann Coulter, want to see the annihilation of the New York Times.
If the truth were told, the real reason they want the New York Times eliminated is because they use big esoteric words in their articles, which our President, and his redneck, KKK, Nascar watching constituency, can’t understand. It gives them a real inferiority complex. Everyone knows that when you make a conservative feel bad, the only way they know how to resolve the issue is by resorting to violence. After all, look at their foreign policy. Mmmm…it is interesting that Ann Coulter, an icon in conservative circles, calls for the destruction of an institution that informs people. It almost seems akin to the book burning policies of the Nazis. Sieg Heil Ann! Sieg Heil!
2006-08-23 08:05:59 · answer #2 · answered by Lawrence Louis 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only thing that's "bombed" is Anne Coulter. What makes Anne Coulter any different than Osama bin Laden?? She spews hatred in the name of what she "believes" and anyone who would publicly trash the widows of 9/11 is a complete idiot. If you agree that bombing buildings is an answer to your woes then you and Anne Coulter are no better than terrorists.
2006-08-23 08:05:36 · answer #3 · answered by carpediem 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Anne Coulter is George Bush dressed in drag.
2006-08-23 08:09:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I don't agree with the NT Times Political views but that is no reason to destroy their building. That sounds more like Saddam or Fidel Castro. We live in America where we treasure the freedom of speech. I do think, however, there should be a way to censor some of their reporters.
2006-08-23 08:01:49 · answer #5 · answered by scat 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately, part of the price we pay for freedom is having newspapers as silly and stupid as the NYT. On the bright side, Americans are waking up and realizing that the press is not as noble as it once was. They at least used to try to maintain the air of being unbiased. Now they just come right out and make up lies.
Newspapers and magazines that are supposed to be neutral, but instead show a strong political slant, are losing readership by the droves. The problem will take care of itself soon enough.
2006-08-23 07:54:16 · answer #6 · answered by FozzieBear 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
She was making a point by kidding. But, yes, that would be great since the New York Times is helping the terrorists.
2006-08-23 07:57:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I dont know when Anne said that,but no, nobody should bomb anything no doubt about how stupid people are who work there,
unless it is really evil people who are trying to phyically hurt people, or Al Frankin, only kidding
2006-08-23 07:57:10 · answer #8 · answered by bkbarile 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Did she say that because she found out the NYT was helping the BUSH admin lie to the world about Iraq? Still, violence is wrong, so I don't agree.
2006-08-23 08:08:33 · answer #9 · answered by cassandra 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
coulter has a right to her opinions, but She's really only trying to make a name for herself so her book sells.
her ideas are the stuff of someone with an IQ of a fencepost.
2006-08-23 07:59:05 · answer #10 · answered by a1tommyL 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋