English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

27 answers

are you kidding me.....did you ride the short bus to school???

2006-08-23 07:52:04 · answer #1 · answered by sweetiepi 5 · 2 0

Even you, a Coulter follower, messed this one up.

She never said all of the victim's wives are scum.
She said that 4 of them are 'loving their husband's deaths'.

...and Coulter uses these deaths to sell books.

Whatever side of the fence you're on, Coulter has done exactly what these 4 widows have done....making Coulter a hypocrite.

Coulter's next book, an autobiography, will be entitled, "Friendless".

2006-08-26 06:11:27 · answer #2 · answered by Jake 4 · 0 0

Yes, Coulter was right about the 4 that are using their dead husbands to make millions of dollars.
God bless the other widows of WTC victims.

2006-08-23 07:52:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

You mischaracterize Coulter's position. She was not criticizing ALL WTC widows, she was specifically going after four widows who had a very anti-administration agenda. Much like Cindy Sheehan, they used the circumstances of their tragedies to promote their opinions. To that extent they were profiteering off of their widowhood. So, within that context, yes, I do agree with her. These women are free to take whatever misguided stand they want, but they cannot "hide" behind their widowhood in order to escape any criticism of their stand. Freedom of speech works both ways.

2006-08-23 07:56:29 · answer #4 · answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7 · 1 0

Did you read the book? That's completely out of context ,what she said was, they seem to be enjoying their husbands deaths. They sure haven't complained about all the publicity they're getting!! You would think there were only four victims instead of thousands. I definitely agree with Ann. And you are helping make her point.. Which was the Liberals use widows and mothers of dead soldiers to scream anti-Bush crap because normally, the press etc. wouldn't dare disagree from fear of retribution.

2006-08-23 08:24:49 · answer #5 · answered by bereal1 6 · 0 0

Yes, I agree. Widows of military personnel who have died don't get that kind of money. I think the government was really, really wrong in paying so much to the survivors of those killed in the 9/11 attack. They have set a precedent now and everyone will want payment for acts of war.

2006-08-23 07:58:09 · answer #6 · answered by scat 1 · 0 0

I absolutely disagree with Ann Coulter with reference to how she characterized those particular 9/11 widows. So they dissented, and attributed the deaths of their spouses to the incompetence of this President and his administration. If anyone has a right to criticize this administration it is those widows who were directly affected by the tragedy on that fateful day.

Ann Coulter does not have the right to talk about exploiting 9/11, because she really milks the tragedy for all its worth in her best selling books, and in her public speaking engagements. Hypocrisy abounds in many ranks, but if one were to elect a queen for this vice, Ann Coulter would be the most viable candidate.

2006-08-23 07:56:24 · answer #7 · answered by Lawrence Louis 7 · 1 2

I don't have a clue what you're talking about, but your question made me uncomfortable. Don't know why because I am from Serbia and I have nothing with WTC victim.
Another question for you: Don't you think that filmmakers who made film about WTC are scum?

2006-08-23 07:50:34 · answer #8 · answered by celia3018 3 · 2 0

Anne Coulter is George Bush dressed in drag, you can tell if you compare adams apples.

2006-08-23 08:12:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, I think it's terrible to put all women in the same boat. I can't believe how mean people can be on this site. So many people were killed that day, so many kids were born who will never know their dads, so many kids lost moms, dads, grandpas, grandmas, aunts, uncles, cousins, people they loved. I think it is a disgrace to call people who have suffered so much scum. Totally sick to me.

2006-08-23 08:27:50 · answer #10 · answered by crash 4 · 0 0

They are CIA agents, moq widows.

They are the Illuminatis, and they own us,
This is the New World Order, and it is your future if the world don't wake up :

And this is what Bush’s minions had to say in 2000;-
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"
Project for the New American Century (2000)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century

“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Confessions (Nuremberg Diary)
http://www.snopes2.com/quotes/goering.htm

"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller: Statement to the United Nations Business Council in September 1994

"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with other around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefellers memoirs (2002)

Make you investigations about Jesuits, the New World Order, the Illuminatis, the Free-Masonery, the Death Clan. They plan a world reduction of population of 80%...Far worse than Hitler...

They are preparing us for 2012, for the New Age, of Relelations, and the return of « God » from Nibiru.

“the zenith meridian at Giza runs through Jupiter at the Hyades in Taurus”, this means “the kingdom (Jupiter) will be restored to Egypt (Taurus) at that precise moment. Thus, Osiris, the Bull of Egypt, will return from the dead at 22:18:13 on December 21, 2012.” El Cairo time.

2006-08-23 07:52:35 · answer #11 · answered by The Patriot 4 · 0 5

fedest.com, questions and answers