2006-08-23 07:09:07 · 10 answers · asked by ar 1 in Education & Reference ➔ Higher Education (University +)
a history is a myth that is proven. myth is history that is not proven
2006-08-23 09:26:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think myth are based on history. And a myth is not really true it could be part of a truth that is stretch into a white lie. History is just facts of the past.
2006-08-23 07:16:00 · answer #2 · answered by Oh Boy!! 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
History is always fact, as in things that actually took place in real life. Myth is either a complete fabrication, or something based on history but altered into myth. The battle of 1066 is history, but Odin and his clan are myth. King Arthur may or may not have lived, but it is certain that there were never dragons, at least not in England, so that could be myth loosely based on history.
2006-08-23 07:14:47 · answer #3 · answered by wyverex_auctor 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the relationship is that sometimes within history a myth is created while the difference is that history are true facts while a myth is something widely believed but untrue.
2006-08-23 07:13:39 · answer #4 · answered by disco ball 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Many myths are based off of a seed of historical truth, but the difference is that myths aren't generally accurate or factual, while something labeled as "history" should be.
2006-08-23 07:12:34 · answer #5 · answered by danika1066 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the relation bet them is that myths are sometimes make-up stories of history
but it is never proven unlike history which has physical or historical objects
ex.
it is history that there was the signing of the declaration of independence (everybody knows that)
it is myth that there is a secret treasure map in it
WONDER IF I`M RIGHT !??!!
2006-08-23 07:20:00 · answer #6 · answered by Winter_Cold 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Myth is history with no recorded proof
History is a myth with recorded proof.
2006-08-23 07:14:51 · answer #7 · answered by Eyedoc 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is simple every myth based on some true facts in history
2006-08-23 07:12:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
that's complicated to split the two. Thorough study of historic previous will continually incorporate extensive-unfold and secondary aspects, yet reading historic previous and enjoying that's plenty diverse than organic study. subsequently, reading historic previous will continually incorporate myths. Revision of historic previous is continually occurring - and lots revision will continually incorporate myths. that's no longer something to get too exercised over. Take the myths with a grain of salt and merely take excitement in reading historic previous.
2016-12-11 13:51:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
myth is a myth..and when it pass ...it will go to history...are you pleased?
2006-08-23 07:12:16 · answer #10 · answered by lins 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋