As you know the research is very important in any branches of science, but what you tell, they are in the first stages of the research, so you should not believe in the research results at the first stages. It takes time to prove what is the properties of coffee or anything else. They should state the results of research in the final stage when it has been approved. But unfortunately, the TVs
or newspapers attempt to inform us without it's approval.
2006-08-23 05:33:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
so-called experts will explain to you how smart they are! They are the ones that a hundred years ago practiced blood letting (opening an artery and bleeding out the germs), evolution (which is really bozo), proclaimed that anything traveling over 35 mph would disintegrate, proclaimed (around 100 years ago) that there was nothing more to invent, wasted two years arguing if pluto was a planet, and can't cure the deseases they claim to be experts on. I think if the "experts" would eat dog crap and the rest of us ate what we dang well want to, the whole world would be a lot better off. Besides, these "experts" are the ones bitching that the planet is over-populated. What difference does it make anyway ----- noone has or will ever escape this life alive.
2006-08-28 20:12:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by watcher 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no such thing as an unbiased research. I've worked for a research company, and let me tell you. We ask questions in such a way that you agree with the person who paid us to do the survey. Anything in large quantities is bad for you. But use your common sense. Chocolate has certain vitamins that are good for your skin, hair and heart. If you have one piece per day ( a small, high quality piece) then yes, it'll help you. But if you plan on eating a whole bag of reccess pb cups, then no, you'll just get fat. Same thing with wine, coffee, dairy, and anything else they've made a "study" about.
2006-08-23 05:27:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Evelyn R 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Researchers use different parimeters for their tests, so both could be right. I know that caffine is good for breathing problems first because the researchers provided evidence and an explaination of what it did. Also that it works, which was that caffeine opens the air sacs in ones lungs. Perhaps evidence is the key to understanding and acceptance?
2006-08-23 05:28:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Marcus R. 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
as a member of a society i am not accepting to the studies of coffee or chocolate. I am very accepting to the studies of eons and centuries over a 10 week- 15 year study. chocolate is good as is coffee. i've had one of the two today and if I feel like it, i'll have the other very soon.
2006-08-30 10:31:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by eric m 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Almost evrything on the media is there in an attempt to increase profit.
You cannot believe anything at all in the newspapers or on TV
2006-08-29 21:50:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hope chocolate chip cookie dough ice cream helps me live longer.
2006-08-23 05:22:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Casey M 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know what to believe anymore, to tell you the truth. :(
No matter what, we all have a date with the grim reaper sooner or later.
2006-08-30 10:47:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by expatriate59 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i don't believe any of the experts...
statistics can be manipulated to prove or disprove any point...
lying-a** sons-of-b*tches!LOL! they don't really know anything... they just like to sound smart and act like they do know something!
2006-08-23 05:25:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by bigmammarush 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
the bottom line is, whatever you consume, consume it moderately. going addicted over anything and your body might juz deteriorate.
2006-08-23 05:22:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by portivee 3
·
0⤊
0⤋