English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

and no short oneline answers please .. I will attempt to delete them all...

2006-08-23 04:35:34 · 29 answers · asked by Shrek'shandsomeidenticaltwin 3 in Politics & Government Government

29 answers

Well you could count on a smaller military, more appeasement of the UN, higher taxes because we will have to fund some kind of national health care, an economic slowdown because of higher taxes, so higher unemployment, amnesty for all illegals who manage to make it across the border (an award for evading capture), stricter gun control laws, a return of the fairness doctrine to stifle conservative talk radio (if you don't know about it here is a link to the wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_doctrine). Whoops you did say things that would benefit America, my mistake.

2006-08-23 04:43:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

...instant credibility..???
more dreaming by the lunatic fringe.

The Clinton administration was one of the most corrupt in history. Don't forget, they dealt with Haliburton the same way, and Enron happened under Clinton/Reno as well. They also pardoned the biggest tax cheat in history in exchange for political contributions.

The Clinton's allowed the terrorists to attack the WTC the first time and get away. They diminished the military and the intelligence communities that led to the 2nd attack.

Have a "fair" tax system? And have some Americans pay far more than anyone else? That's not fairness, not democracy; that's socialism.

Go ahead and sit on the Washington monument, both that and the idea of a Clinton back in office are sick.

2006-08-23 11:24:36 · answer #2 · answered by RockHunter 7 · 0 0

America simply wouldn't benefit from Hillary Clinton. America would still be even more so involved in this power struggle between political parties. I'm all for a woman president but the fact that her husband cheated on her, shows her desperation to remain "in". Bill Clinton was as I'm sure you're well aware in office when the WTC parking garage was attacked. The devestation of September 11, could have been prevented. To have another Clinton in office would just be a huge mistake.

2006-08-23 05:02:04 · answer #3 · answered by scharfie528 4 · 1 1

If you think Bush and the GOP have expanded government, they would be amateurs compared to her. Remember, this is the woman who wanted the government to seize 1/7 of the entire US economy with her "health care" initiative It would have provided neither health nor care to most Americans. We will all "benefit" with higher taxes.

Once again, you think Bush and Co. have made us less free, a Dem Congress and HRC regime would make the Patriot Act look like a Jaywalking ordinance. These are people who want to control every aspect of our lives from cradle (if we are lucky to make it out of the womb) to the grave. We would lose any choice about our health care first. Next we lose, the ability to live where we want, choose what foods we want to eat, where/if we can smoke (and I am a lifetime non-smoker), after these are eaten away then they'll go to work on the real pesky ones like speaking out against Queen Hilly.

The thing that angers the left about Bush the most isn't the questionable elections, the war, the "grab" for freedoms, it is that the Bush is doing things the left had planned for when they are in power. No upstart should take the power they want for themselves.

2006-08-23 04:52:40 · answer #4 · answered by Crusader1189 5 · 1 1

Hostile conditions under which to answer. Lets see.........

America would gain instant global credability. The world would see that YOUR country can elect some who knows how to manage the banana company instead of someone that just eats the bananas.

The new First Lady/Gentleman would be there to assist in Gobal matters of the heart. It would be a first for America where the wife of a previuos President was actually elected under her own name (Nancy Reagan was the President through her dearly departed Ronald).

The world would hope that Mrs. Clinton will focus on American domestic issues like FAIR taxes for all, Public Health Care, corruption in Government (Bush-Cheney Administration) and Big Business (Haliburton), outlawing Islam, stop the out-sourcing of American jobs to foreign countries and stop the current GLOBAL MANIFEST DESTINY that grips the neo-conservative way of life.

Maybe, she can truly show that an American government is capable of minding it's own business instead of inflicting the entire world with the American Way of Life through political and economic extortion. Make Americans (the rich 10%) accountable to the rest of America ( the poor or struggling 90%) and not invest their time and money offshore.

Welcome to the New America are moto is 'If we are going to stick the Washington monument up anybodies deriere, we promise to sit on it first! We are a New America for the current millenium and we promise to behave ourselves and play nice with everyone But we will not be taken for granted!

This is truly the longest answer I have ever given. I hope this pleases Master.

2006-08-23 05:13:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Clinton has been attempting for 15 years to get her wellness bill handed yet can no longer get Democratic or Republican help. the place have all her "stable techniques and opportunities for u . s . a ." been for the previous 7+ years she has been in place of work? She claims to have carried out good issues for our protection tension yet we have not considered them; we've much less scientific help now than ever yet she claims to have made super advancements. She voted for the financial ruin bill and voted for the conflict. inspite of her claims of being against the conflict she keeps to help each bill that helps the continuation of the conflict. She claims she is the suited candidate to be Commander-in-chief; there are a number of Republican applicants that have the experience and are much greater advantageous qualified for that place and a pair of have already filled state Commander-in-chief Positions. She has performed the down trodden picked on lady function and that's magnificent how gullible some all people is in accepting it. She says she desires to be the 1st lady president of america; that's her genuine motivator, no longer the stable of the country! I concern people have come to have self belief the place of work of the president has little meaning. Why else could they placed up "novelty" votes? A=everyone B=yet C=Clinton!

2016-11-05 11:09:38 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Nothing,
She is no different than any other American President, whose only aim is to attract votes of different demographic parts of this country by appealing to their emotions, and doing nothing about economy, social security, etc. Oops, I missed out something all of the president candidates are (surely) experts on creating wars in every different part of this world and don't forget global warming...

Although I've been trying hard, I can't find a benefit. I can think of a disaster, which could the result of the former First Lady's (or the other candidates') threats to the rest of the world: a war against Syria, Iran or maybe N.Korea.

I hope Hillary Clinton, just like any other candidate, follows her conscious mind and does something good for U.S. rather than the arms companies...

So, no benefit according to my opinion, for the time-being.

2006-08-23 04:45:24 · answer #7 · answered by David A 1 · 1 2

Anyone would be better than Bush. He is a puppet. She would run this country ten times as well. After 8 years with Republicans who are impeding the development of humanity, (vetoing a bill to keep funding stem cells) any Democrat will do better. It's not that she's a woman, it's that she's a Democrat. Things have not been worse since Bush came into office. It's time for a Democratic president, regardless of sex.

2006-08-23 05:40:36 · answer #8 · answered by !{¤©¤}! 4 · 1 1

Hillary Clinton is a very intelligent woman, whether you like her politics or not. She's got public appeal and she is the best the Democrats have to offer, besides Joe Biden, who would make a great president but he has no national appeal.

2006-08-23 04:43:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

1. Higher Taxes
2. Cut and run from anything that goes "BOO"
3.Socialism
4. An end to the " BILL OF RIGHTS "
5.Surrender to the First one who shoots at us
6. More Taxes , to support those who will not support themslves
7. The end of a FREE America

2006-08-23 04:46:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers