mAnn Coulter YET AGAIN, making false statements.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G6U1nUg3CHY
Proposition 187 in CA, was voted AGAINST by Hispanics, not in favor as she claims. You can't possibly think this woman is credible, she's got all her facts backwards--typical Con!
2006-08-23 04:14:57 · 7 answers · asked by Kookoo Bananas 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
WMCRITTER: Please tell me you are joking. From the URL you gave me, it says, "Initially, no population group opposed the measure. Latinos came the closest, registering only 52 percent support. Both Asian Americans and African Americans heavily favored Prop. 187. On November 8, 77 percent of Latinos voted against the measure and were joined in opposition by 53 percent of Asian American and African American voters"
77% of latinos voted AGAINST the measure, compared to 51% who INITIALLY said supported it (before actually voting). Please learn to READ. This further proves COULTER is clueless and that I AM RIGHT.
2006-08-23 04:50:47 · update #1
Just another example of Neo_Con double-talk propaganda. Keep the public confused and guessing.
2006-08-23 04:27:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Once again, you are wrong. Further supporting my assertion that Kookoo is wrong 100% of the time.
The fact is that (according to exit polls) 52% of Latino voters voted in favor of prop 187.
The 40% approval figure cited in wikipedia is based on total Latino population including non-registered voters and ILLEGALS. Obviously the illegals are not going to favor the measure, but since they are not citizens or voters, their approval is irrelevant.
2006-08-23 04:45:21 · answer #2 · answered by Aegis of Freedom 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i think of this is rather awful too, yet if certainty learn that the democratic occasion is doing this and without the permission of the mummy and father. youthful infants are no longer in threat for many cancers in a protracted time in existence till they have kinfolk with a guy who can infect them with the virus. this could be a scientific looking. no longer in basic terms that, in addition they reported NOW, that it is not honestly helpful against that rigidity. although, this is the liberals who instituted his needed vaccine. To me, it is going to be a parental decision, no longer the call of government, so I agree. and another issues the liberals have completed is to rearrange with the companies that write the recent books for the undemanding with the aid of extreme college are being instructed they might desire to contain the gay existence-type so as that teenagers have their thoughts open which way they might % to stay; and that they % to show out each and all of the useful homosexuals. this is advantageous to enable people have equivalent time on the subject of successes; although, the dept of education did this act in the process the summer season months final 3 hundred and sixty 5 days, so as that the mummy and father would not pay any interest or be introduced into the communicate. It think of it is going to be as much as the mummy and father and not the dept of education to coach those issues. They underestimate the parental oversight and don't need for them to have a say. i'm in basic terms questioning how a lot of you have been responsive to that.
2016-10-02 10:55:34 · answer #3 · answered by puga 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you honestly accusing someone else of making false statements?
I have not seen you make ONE fact based statement on this entire site.
Nice try
2006-08-23 04:18:32 · answer #4 · answered by SVern 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Me and Blair like to hold hands!!
2006-08-23 04:17:47 · answer #5 · answered by Dubya & The Brain 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Republicans are stupid.
2006-08-23 04:17:51 · answer #6 · answered by !{¤©¤}! 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
please repeat in English
I'll pray for you
2006-08-23 06:12:19 · answer #7 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋