Of course... in fact America is the biggest designer and builder of weapons of mass destruction in the whole world... and every once in a while, the military has to test the weapons to see if they work and what they are worth, in money, on the world's market.
That latest mess in Lebanon was just a test conflict to see how the American weapons work against the latest russian and iranian offerings.... and it did wonders for the land mine manufacturer's bottom line.
HEY... you gotta' love DOW Chemical...
2006-08-23 04:06:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Are you one of those people who are willing to believe even the most ridiculous and outlandish statements about the US?
The fact is, that we've long ago destroyed any chemical or biological weapons we may have had. Also, by nature, nuclear weapons degrade over time, so most of the nuclear weapons from 30, 40, 50 years ago have probably been dismantled.
Sorry if the truth is boring, but that's how it is.
2006-08-23 04:12:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
what do you think of isreal having over 400 nuclear and hydrogen weps- they do, and even if they use 'em, (which maybe they might be....
planet earth will be the loser- of course all who live on it as well,
ie; nuclear winter Russia can easily supply Iran with a counterpoint to that, and the US can double the both put together and still have some spares-
where do Americans go after sparking off Armegeddon? will the Almighty be proud of us?
What happened to Bush's Roadmap to Peace? like all other Bushy propaganda- the whole effort is about Oil, Soil and wrongly taking what other people got-
Humans have such potential, but are so easily tempted by (our own) evil, murder and killing-
have a happy after-life- my prayer is that it can be turned around,
and fast....
2006-08-23 04:12:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by omnimog 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course.
Weapons cannot be stored indefinitely. They decay. Destroying a bomb is not only dangerous, but also expensive. Knowing that we here in the U.S. love nothing more than money, we hate to throw something away that could still be used. When we went to war with Iraq we let others (i.e. the Europeans) pay us for the conduct. In this way we extracted money and used up our old bombs.
In other words, be stuff the holes in our budget with the holes in the heads of people who have no business with us, we don't hate or haven't done a thing to us. So it is all just business... no hard feelings. Fine, hundreds of thousands of people die because of our greed for money and oil, but human life means nothing to us. After all, humans are around in abundance and regrow every years. That is the only resource we will never run out of.
War is just another business; so next time we bomb your country, and inadvertently we will, please be understanding and hold no grudge against us. We have to do it.
2006-08-23 04:08:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by The answer man 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
there are a range of guns which will be used to create mass quantities of destruction. those might want to comprise guns, grenades, explosives, and so on. The label "WMD" is reserved for a particular form of weapon that may kill tens or thousands of thousands of folk straight away. for this reason the "mass" element of "mass destruction". guns can and do kill, yet basically one by one. A nuclear weapon can take a city thoroughly off the map in a lot less time than it takes to load a gun. Legally (and that is a felony time period) WMD's traditionally talk with nuclear, gas and organic and organic guns. this isn't to assert different sorts of guns are not risky, have not finally killed more desirable human beings over the years or something like that... yet i might want to rather face a loopy individual with a gun than a loopy individual with a nuke! per chance it truly is basically me...
2016-11-27 00:37:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Whats the growing season for a killing seed? Does it need alot of water?
2006-08-23 05:19:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by kristycordeaux 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The US has 5,300 operational nuclear warheads (according to the top link). Bottom link gives a timeline of proliferation...
2006-08-23 04:28:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Dastardly 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's why we will remain the worlds most powerful country for centurys.
2006-08-23 05:50:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
amde? it's AIMED you 5th grader we have AIMED weapons of mass destruction at dolts who can't spell and killed civilians with seeds when they expiry what the hell are you talking about?!!!
2006-08-23 04:09:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by clinton_planned_9/11 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
50 nuclear war heads. More than any country in the world. You do the math.
2006-08-23 04:07:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Centered 4
·
0⤊
1⤋