English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

21 answers

Inzy takes situation very emotionally(childishly).

The game would have been quite different if the Pak team had arrived on the field and continued with the game and at the end of the day Inzy must have asked PCB to appeal for some justification towards the ball tampering issue.

2006-08-23 21:41:16 · answer #1 · answered by Sanjeev K 2 · 1 0

Pakistan didn't do it.Hair was hasty in his decision.Inzy bhai should have head-butted Hair like Zidane did.But he wouldnt-he is a gentleman.The way he protested was right.Many "former"s say he should have played on and complained later.But if he did so ,it would have fallen on deaf ears.It would have been a small column news at the end of any newspaper.Now bcoz of his protest we're having this discussion. Man, some people in ICC like Hair and Chris Broad(remember him -he penalised 5 Indian players incl Sachin/Dravid/Harbhajan Singh for excessive appealing-what abtt Shane Warne for that matter,he gets most of his wickets like that) are RACISTS and should be thrown out.They think they are superior to the Subcontinent.Pakistan should withdraw if Hair stands in a match as Umpire.India,Pakistan,Bangla,Lanka should quit ICC and form their own federation.

2006-08-26 03:31:59 · answer #2 · answered by shreeram c s 2 · 0 0

No offense but the pakis have a history of ball tampering. From Inthikab Alam to Imran Khan to Wasim Akram to Waqar Younus and now to Mohammed Asif, they have perfected the art of reverse swing and how? By scuffing the seam of the ball by scratching using different methods. So Darrell Hair had every right to suspect them this time too. But again was there anything caught on video? Nothing..So what was Hair,Doctrove and Procter thinking in their minds?

2006-08-23 13:42:24 · answer #3 · answered by abalakris 2 · 1 0

Hello,
Well... I'm fully agree with u bec.. Pakistani's are not cheaters and they doesnt have to tamper the ball to win bec... the ball was already reverse swinging and Pakistan was about to get wickets.But if they win what Pakistan will get?Nothing bec... Pakistan already have lost the series.

2006-08-23 12:57:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

u got 2 b kiddin me?classy and good faith? just listen 2 inzy 2 know all about class,and check their history 2 know about there ball tampering.

2006-08-26 15:38:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i want to kick the a** of hayer. my frend pak did not tampered how come 26 cameras on the field did not shown anybody doin this. & hayer caught it??? if its ok y dont he is telling that player's name whom he saw tampering.??? y he did not told injy about the changing of ball??? this much happened & u except no protest from pak??? umpires shuld have taken care of completing the match but they did not . y dont they come out when pak come on the field. daryl is an old @#$ always unfair to asians. by the way pak is much superior team than england.
i am an indian

2006-08-23 20:24:01 · answer #6 · answered by joy5122 1 · 0 1

Pakistan just cannot win without cheating.
Imagine if there were no umpires dude.then pak will never win they r d worlds biggest cheaters in d world

2006-08-27 00:42:13 · answer #7 · answered by amazed !!! 4 · 0 0

Really don`t know if they did temper of not. But Pakistani being classy is the most outrageous statement of the century. You should see the behaviour of their captain before making this statement

2006-08-23 12:12:55 · answer #8 · answered by Jonu S 2 · 0 1

You royally insulted the words classy and good.

2006-08-24 07:02:42 · answer #9 · answered by Masked Mark 3 · 2 0

they had an upper hand throughout the test anyway. The thing is, this time they didnt tamper.

2006-08-23 19:37:45 · answer #10 · answered by Dead 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers