Watch & listen to Ann Coulter being completely CLUELESS on politics and history. This is HILARIOUS!
http://youtube.com/watch?v=X5z5-EYaALE&mode=related&search=coulter
What do you think?
2006-08-23
03:45:40
·
17 answers
·
asked by
Kookoo Bananas
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Hey, morons! Any idiot can write a book, even if it's badly written. That's not a sign of intelligence. After watching this video there's no DENYING how clueless she is, you're just not accepting the truth.
2006-08-23
04:00:05 ·
update #1
She's a complete moron! Like most of the Repubes/Neocons they shoot off at the mouth not knowing any facts or hard truth. She writes a book and when questioned about a 'fact' she stated doesn't even know the truth?? Kinda reminds me of DumBya!
She is the new Repube pet that they are calling the 'pretty face' on TV.....Yeah right! It should be 'Pretty Stupid!'
She epitomizes the ignorance and cluelessness of the Neocons / Repubes. Think she got where she is with her brains???
Hey Dr. Feelgood that was a horriffic picture yiiiiiiiiii yiiiiiiii! :) reminds me of the Seinfeld episode! :)
2006-08-23 07:34:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by CATHOLIC PRIEST!! 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
That is strange because my book by Ann
Coulter has 34 pages of references including some from your people, oh and an index. Try reading her books.
2006-08-23 13:20:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I happen to think Ann Coulter is an intelligent lady who tells it like it is. And she is definately not clueless on politics and history. She has written many books on the subject.
2006-08-23 10:56:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mags 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
Canada was not officially part of the Vietnam conflict, but many thousands of Canadians volunteered to fight with us in the U.S. Army.
Furthermore, you can find 1 mistake from any public figure. Nobody is 100% right 100% of the time. Although Kookoo is 100% wrong 100% of the time.
2006-08-23 11:04:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Aegis of Freedom 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Don't blame the entire Republican party for the lunatic ravings of a single person or small group.
Then again, I keep seeing people argue that the entire Muslim population should rise up to denounce terrorist fanatics, so maybe the same standard should apply here. Any Republican who doesn't rise up to denounce the few who are fanatic should be held accountable.
And if one of their party commits a crime, any else in the same party who doesn't denounce that person should also be punished just as if they had committed the crime themselves. That seems to be what people are advocated regarding Moslems. Why shouldn't the same standard apply across the board?
2006-08-23 11:00:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
Man Coulter is nothing but an attention whore, and she gets lots of it. Michelle Malkin is another one. She wishes so badly that she was born white, so she she could be a man Coulter wanna be, lmfao.
2006-08-23 10:55:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
And what is a person who idolizes such a moron like the Coulter TS?
Even a larger fool.
2006-08-23 10:52:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by The answer man 4
·
3⤊
2⤋
Another of the million reasons why Republicans are STUPID! They know nothing. Just like GWB here, she doesn't know any facts. This is why today's administrations is worse than a Democratic one would be.
2006-08-23 12:47:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by !{¤©¤}! 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
you think all democrats dont act like that ALL THE TIME! maybe a conservative goofs up once but democrats do it a the time e.g. bill clinton
2006-08-23 18:08:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by cardboardmanx 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Worse than their stupidity is their malevolence. They have a severe complex when it comes to Liberals, for some inexplicable reason, They act like Liberals are the enemy. Ann Coulter is especially rabid. After 9/11 she wrote, "We need to invade their countries, kill their leaders, and convert them to Christianity". Well, not only AREN'T Muslims susceptible to conversion, certainly after invading them and killing their leaders they'd be even LESS apt to listen to us! DUH!
2006-08-23 10:52:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by kreevich 5
·
3⤊
2⤋