English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Did you see John Mark Karr's entry in www.urbandictionary.com?
I seriously made up a word using Karr in it and submitted it to www.urbandictionary.com. When I checked to see if anyone already submitted a similar word I found the work "Karr" and it was submitted by someone named Mark on Dec 1, 2003. He defined Karr as "someone who F ucks lobsters- a child molester" check it out for yourself on the website.

The word I submitted was "Karrmel toe"- the look you achieve when a man pulls his pants up to his chest.

Nonetheless, after looking this up do you think John Mark Karr actually could have submitted this definition about himself back in 2003? I called and left a message on the Boulder media hotline but not sure if they got my message. Maybe a teeny tiny piece of evidence in this case.

2006-08-23 03:18:54 · 3 answers · asked by bearklektor 5 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

3 answers

It means someone knew about him before he came into the lime light with this case. I do think it's somewhat significant, maybe not to be brought up in the case because it could be another Karr ( what are the odds though) but interesting none the less

2006-08-23 03:22:05 · answer #1 · answered by Me 6 · 3 0

That guy is just sickk.....picking on a child

he should be drag across the street with his legs tied up to a car or he should be shot or beaten to death

PPL like him should die!

2006-08-23 10:29:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

He's just trying to beat a child porn rap in Thailand

2006-08-23 10:20:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers