English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Im not sure im straight on what her opinions are exactly? Any info would help thanks!

2006-08-23 03:06:38 · 15 answers · asked by Mapitsa 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

15 answers

1 censorship of free speech
2 banning of gun ownership
3 socialised medicine
4 passing laws that restrict our rights in the constituion
5 killing of babies
6 state guardianship of children
7 midnight basketball
8 lesbian and gay special rights
9 higher taxes on ALL PEOPLE
10 weakening the military

2006-08-23 03:12:47 · answer #1 · answered by W E J 4 · 7 0

She stands for most of the things liberals do; universal health care, which is her baby pet. She says she supports the Iraq war, although I think she just goes along with the majority whoever leads at the time. She has done nothing for her constituents since she's been a senator, nothing noteworthy. She's using her office mainly as a stepping stone like a college grad uses his first job on a resume to make a big plunge-play.
Give her little credibility after seeing her actions as first lady and the way she brushed aside Bill's indiscretions and her own involvement in the Whitewater fiasco.

2006-08-23 03:37:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

She's a Democrat.

Which pretty much means she follows the Democratic platform, which seems primarily focused on bashing Republicans.

I haven't noticed any coherent message coming from a Democratic candidate other than that (and fixing Social Security) in about five years.

2006-08-23 04:04:12 · answer #3 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0 0

Well she's a democrat... so she is loudly shouting "I'm not Bush", which happens to be the Democratic National Party platform.

She is left of socialism. She claims to be for the "common man" but proposes to limit their constitutional rights. She promotes entitlement programs that eliminate personal responsibility. And most heinously, she proposes a system of taxation that is nothing short of a redistribution of wealth, penalizing the successful "for the common good".

2006-08-23 05:42:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

i'm waiting for a woman to run this united states of america! we've yet to put in the workplace of president ,somebody who's in a position to work out previous their penis and run the government the way it would be ran. possibly a woman would think of with the superb head. we are stable and in a position to attend to alot extra desirable than adult men have confidence and it desires to take place. no rely if that's Hilary Clinton or Condoleezza Rice, we would desire to hire the lady's attitude in government. i'd vote for her if she ran.

2016-12-17 15:51:11 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Hillary Clinton stands for Hillary Clinton, nobody else.

2006-08-23 03:21:16 · answer #6 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 3 0

She's very vocal about the important "issue of the day,"

Basically, if its reported on the news she's for the issue in the way most of the news agency's put their spin on it.

i.e. If CNN says the war in Iraq is wrong Hillary is against the war.
if NY Times says illegal immigration is destroying country... she's against immigration.

Basically, shes against anything you see reported on Fox news.

i.e. Fox says Israel has a right to defend itself
Hillary says we should let the spineless (and worthless) UN defend Israel using primarily soldiers from countries who don't recognize Israel as a state. (BTW U.N. was supposed to be preventing what happened, but they proved their worthlessness there.)

So, if you want to know what Hilary stands for just wait for the most recent bandwagon...she'll be on it.

2006-08-23 03:18:21 · answer #7 · answered by The Man 5 · 5 0

She stands for whatever you want her to stand for, as long as it doesn't cross into the "ultra-conservative" realm, which for her means anything just to the right of center. when she originally ran for Senator she ran on a far-left platform, now she is trying to pass herself off as a moderate. she is being a chameleon to try and help her chances of getting into the white house and making her husband first "gentleman". If you actually listen to all of the things she claims to stand for she contradicts herself repeatedly.

2006-08-23 03:17:05 · answer #8 · answered by nathanael_beal 4 · 5 0

Herself.

2006-08-23 03:14:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Continuing the destruction of this country that her idiot husband started!

2006-08-23 03:11:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

fedest.com, questions and answers